The constraint of law - A study of Supreme Court dissensus

被引:4
作者
Benesh, Sara C. [1 ]
Spaeth, Harold J.
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Supreme Court; federal courts; judicial behavior; law; dissenting opinions; judicial preferences;
D O I
10.1177/1532673X06296991
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
To study the behavior of judges, one must first consider whether judges are just like any other political actor (e.g., legislators) or whether, because of their affiliation with the judiciary, law constrains their behavior to some extent. Research aimed at considering the extent to which judges are constrained by the law is sparse, and conclusions resulting from such research are mixed. In this article, the authors explore the extent to which law constrains judges by focusing on the decision to dissent rather than concur when Supreme Court justices write separately. The authors find that, although law matters, it does not constrain.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 768
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], JUDICIAL CONFLICT CO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MAJORITY RULE MINORI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior and Institutions
[4]  
BENESH SC, 2005, JUSTICE CTR DATABASE
[5]   Of time and consensual norms in the Supreme Court [J].
Caldeira, GA ;
Zorn, CJW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 42 (03) :874-902
[6]  
Cardozo Benjamin., 1921, NATURE JUDICIAL PROC
[7]  
CORLEY P, 2004, CONCURRING OPINION W
[8]  
DANELSKI DJ, 1986, JUDGES POLITICS INTR, P568
[9]   The claim of issue creation on the US Supreme Court [J].
Epstein, L ;
Segal, JA ;
Johnson, T .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1996, 90 (04) :845-852
[10]   The norm of consensus on the US Supreme Court [J].
Epstein, L ;
Segal, JA ;
Spaeth, HJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 45 (02) :362-377