Fetal Growth Biometry as Predictors of Shoulder Dystocia in a Low-Risk Obstetrical Population

被引:2
作者
Newman, Roger B. [1 ]
Stevens, Danielle R. [2 ]
Hunt, Kelly J. [2 ]
Grobman, William A. [3 ]
Owen, John [4 ]
Sciscione, Anthony [5 ]
Wapner, Ronald J. [6 ]
Skupski, Daniel [7 ]
Chien, Edward K. [8 ]
Wing, Deborah A. [9 ,10 ]
Ranzini, Angela C. [8 ,11 ]
Porto, Manuel [9 ]
Grantz, Katherine L. [12 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[5] Christiana Hlth Care Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Wilmington, DE USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] New York Presbyterian Queens, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Flushing, NY USA
[8] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metro Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Orange, CA USA
[10] Fountain Valley Reg Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fountain Valley, CA USA
[11] St Peters Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[12] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Div Intramural Populat Hlth Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
fetal biometrics; fetal growth ultrasound; prediction of shoulder dystocia; asymmetric fetal growth; BRACHIAL-PLEXUS PALSY; CESAREAN DELIVERY; MACROSOMIA; WEIGHT; ASYMMETRY; FETUS; SINGLETONS; INFANTS; WOMEN; LABOR;
D O I
10.1055/a-1787-6991
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to evaluate fetal biometrics as predictors of shoulder dystocia (SD) in a low-risk obstetrical population. Study Design Participants were enrolled as part of a U.S.-based prospective cohort study of fetal growth in low-risk singleton gestations ( n = 2,802). Eligible women had liveborn singletons >= 2,500 g delivered vaginally. Sociodemographic, anthropometric, and pregnancy outcome data were abstracted by research staff. The diagnosis of SD was based on the recorded clinical impression of the delivering physician. Simple logistic regression models were used to examine associations between fetal biometrics and SD. Fetal biometric cut points, selected by Youden's J and clinical determination, were identified to optimize predictive capability. A final model for SD prediction was constructed using backward selection. Our dataset was randomly divided into training (60%) and test (40%) datasets for model building and internal validation. Results A total of 1,691 women (98.7%) had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, while 23 (1.3%) experienced SD. There were no differences in sociodemographic or maternal anthropometrics between groups. Epidural anesthesia use was significantly more common (100 vs. 82.4%; p = 0.03) among women who experienced SD compared with those who did not. Amniotic fluid maximal vertical pocket was also significantly greater among SD cases (5.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.1 +/- 1.5 cm; odds ratio = 1.32 [95% confidence interval: 1.03,1.69]). Several fetal biometric measures were significantly associated with SD when dichotomized based on clinically selected cut-off points. A final prediction model was internally valid with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.99). At a model probability of 1%, sensitivity (71.4%), specificity (77.5%), positive (3.5%), and negative predictive values (99.6%) did not indicate the ability of the model to predict SD in a clinically meaningful way. Conclusion Other than epidural anesthesia use, neither sociodemographic nor maternal anthropometrics were significantly associated with SD in this low-risk population. Both individually and in combination, fetal biometrics had limited ability to predict SD and lack clinical usefulness.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 901
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population [J].
Matijevic, Ratko ;
Grgic, Ozren ;
Knezevic, Mario .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 111 (01) :41-44
[32]   Degree of fetal umbilical venous constriction at the abdominal wall in a low-risk population at 20-40 weeks of gestation [J].
Skulstad, SM ;
Kiserud, T ;
Rasmussen, S .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2002, 22 (11) :1022-1027
[33]   Idiopathic urinary findings and fetal growth restriction in low risk pregnancy [J].
Zadeh, Sedigheh Hantush ;
Khosravi, Dezireh ;
Shahbazi, Fatemeh ;
Jebeli, Zeinab Kaviani ;
Ahmadi, Farokhlegha ;
Shirazi, Mahboobeh .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 171 (01) :57-60
[34]   Impact of continuous electronic fetal monitoring on birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancies [J].
Heelan-Fancher, Lisa ;
Shi, Ling ;
Zhang, Yuqing ;
Cai, Yurun ;
Nawai, Ampicha ;
Leveille, Suzanne .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2019, 46 (02) :311-317
[35]   Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery in a population-based study of low-risk pregnancies [J].
Farchi, Sara ;
Di Lallo, Domenico ;
Franco, Francesco ;
Polo, Arianna ;
Lucchini, Renato ;
Calzolari, Flaminia ;
De Curtis, Mario .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 88 (06) :729-732
[36]   Ponderal index (PI) vs birth weight centiles in the low-risk primigravid population: Which is the better predictor of fetal wellbeing? [J].
Cooley, S. M. ;
Donnelly, J. C. ;
Walsh, T. ;
Kirkham, C. ;
Gillan, J. ;
Geary, M. P. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 32 (05) :439-443
[37]   Interaction of chorioamnionitis at term with maternal, fetal and obstetrical factors as predictors of neonatal mortality: a population-based cohort study [J].
Zaki, Dina ;
Balayla, Jaques ;
Beltempo, Marc ;
Gazil, Guillaume ;
Nuyt, Anne Monique ;
Boucoiran, Isabelle .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
[38]   Induction of Labour in Nulliparous Women Beyond Term in a Low-Risk Population [J].
Pretscher, Jutta ;
Weiss, Christel ;
Dammer, Ulf ;
Stumpfe, Florian ;
Faschingbauer, Florian ;
Beckmann, Matthias W. ;
Kehl, Sven .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2019, 223 (01) :33-39
[39]   Construction of Weight Gain Charts in a Low-Risk Obstetric Belgian Population [J].
Guelinckx, I. ;
Beckers, K. ;
Vansant, G. ;
Devlieger, R. .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2010, 69 (01) :57-61
[40]   Prenatal detection of a high-risk group for intrauterine growth restriction based on sonographic fetal biometry [J].
Yoshida, S ;
Unno, N ;
Kagawa, H ;
Shinozuka, N ;
Kozuma, S ;
Taketani, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2000, 68 (03) :225-232