The effects of a novel personal comfort system on thermal comfort, physiology and perceived indoor environmental quality, and its health implications - Stimulating human thermoregulation without compromising thermal comfort

被引:39
作者
Luo, Wei [1 ]
Kramer, Rick [1 ,2 ]
de Kort, Yvonne [3 ]
Rense, Pascal [1 ]
Lichtenbelt, Wouter van Marken [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Sch Nutr & Translat Res Metab, Dept Nutr & Movement Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Built Environm, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
drifting temperature; health; indoor air quality; personal comfort system; thermal comfort; thermoregulation; MODERATE TEMPERATURE DRIFT; BROWN ADIPOSE-TISSUE; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; SKIN-TEMPERATURE; PUTATIVE CONTRIBUTORS; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; BODY-TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; SENSATION;
D O I
10.1111/ina.12951
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The classical textbook interpretation of thermal comfort is that it occurs when the thermoregulatory effort is minimized. However, stimulating human thermoregulatory systems may benefit health and increase body thermal resilience. To address this gap, we tested a novel personal comfort system (PCS) that targets only the extremities and the head, leaving the rest of the body exposed to a moderately drifting temperature (17-25 degrees C). A randomized, cross-over study was conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, mimicking an office setting. Eighteen participants completed two scenarios, one with a PCS and another one without a PCS in 17-25 degrees C ambient conditions. The results indicate that the PCS improved thermal comfort in 17-23 degrees C and retained active thermoregulatory control. The torso skin temperature, underarm-finger temperature gradients, energy expenditure, substrate oxidations and physical activity were not affected by the PCS in most cases. Only slight changes in cardiovascular responses were observed between the two scenarios. Moreover, the PCS boosted pleasure and arousal. At 25 degrees C, the PCS did not improve thermal comfort, but significantly improved air quality perceptions and mitigated eye strain. These findings suggest that human physiological thermoregulation can be stimulated without compromising thermal comfort by using a PCS that only targets the extremities in cold conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Ergonomics of the thermal environment _ Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, 0886 ISO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, 10551 ISO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, COMPR PHYSIOL, DOI DOI 10.1002/CPHY.CP040107
  • [5] Arens E, 2006, J THERM BIOL, V31, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2005.11.028
  • [6] ASHRAE, 2017, ASHRAE HDB FUND
  • [7] ASHRAE, 2010, ANSI/ASHRAE 55:2010
  • [8] BLIGH J, 1973, Journal of Applied Physiology, V35, P941
  • [9] Boulant JA, 2011, Comprehensive Physiology, DOI 10.1002/cphy.cp040106
  • [10] MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL
    BRADLEY, MM
    LANG, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) : 49 - 59