A new methodology to assess the maximum CO2 geosequestration capacity of shale reservoirs with SRV based on wellbore pressure

被引:25
作者
Chu, Hongyang [1 ]
Liao, Xinwei [1 ]
Chen, Zhiming [1 ]
Liu, Wenyuan [1 ]
Mu, Lingyu [1 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Coll Petr Engn, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
CO2 storage capacity; Shale reservoirs; Wellbore pressure; Verification; Sensitivity analysis; ENHANCED GAS RECOVERY; STORAGE CAPACITY; CARBON-DIOXIDE; PORE STRUCTURE; ADSORPTION; SEQUESTRATION; BAKKEN; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcou.2019.06.010
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Shale reservoirs are promising geological sites for CO2 storage due to their high total organic content (TOC) and the large-scale hydraulic fracturing operations. In order to critically evaluate a potential storage reservoir, fast, robust tools are needed to assess the CO2 storage capacity. Based on our previous work, an efficient method based on semi-analytical solution for calculating the maximum CO2 storage capacity in shale formations is derived, based on the injection wellbore pressure. The new methodology fully reflects the flow, diffusion, and adsorption processes of CO2 in shales. It also simulates natural fractures, hydraulic fractures, and the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV). The semi-analytical solution utilizing a Laplace transform and Stehfest numerical inversion is developed to evaluate the wellbore pressure and storage capacity in shale formations, which is verified using numerical simulations. A case study of the derived method on the Bakken Shale shows that the CO2 storage capacity is strongly controlled by the CO2 injection rate, adsorption index, and storage ratio. It is also found that the effective diffusion coefficient and mobility ratio affect the CO2 storage capacity during different periods of the CO2 storage process.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 255
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[21]   Potential for enhanced gas recovery and CO2 storage in the Marcellus Shale in the Eastern United States [J].
Godec, Michael ;
Koperna, George ;
Petrusak, Robin ;
Oudinot, Anne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2013, 118 :95-104
[22]   Methodology for assessing CO2 storage potential of organic-rich shale formations [J].
Goodman, Angela ;
Fukai, Isis ;
Dilmore, Robert ;
Frailey, Scott ;
Bromhal, Grant ;
Soeder, Dan ;
Gorecki, Charlie ;
Peck, Wesley ;
Rodosta, Traci ;
Guthrie, George .
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 :5178-5184
[23]   Adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide on gas shale and pure mineral samples [J].
Heller, Robert ;
Zoback, Mark .
JOURNAL OF UNCONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS RESOURCES, 2014, 8 (0C) :14-24
[24]  
*IHS EN, 2006, US PROD WELL HIST CO
[25]   Sorption equilibrium and kinetics of CO2 on clay minerals from subcritical to supercritical conditions: CO2 sequestration at nanoscale interfaces [J].
Jeon, Pil Rip ;
Choi, Jiwon ;
Yun, Tae Sup ;
Lee, Chang-Ha .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 255 :705-715
[26]   Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play-Experimental studies on Bakken shales [J].
Jin, Lu ;
Hawthorne, Steven ;
Sorensen, James ;
Pekot, Lawrence ;
Kurz, Bathany ;
Smith, Steven ;
Heebink, Loreal ;
Herdegen, Volker ;
Bosshart, Nicholas ;
Torres, Jose ;
Dalkhaa, Chantsalmaa ;
Peterson, Kyle ;
Gorecki, Charles ;
Steadman, Edward ;
Harju, John .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 208 :171-183
[27]   Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity of Organic-Rich Shales [J].
Kang, S. M. ;
Fathi, E. ;
Ambrose, R. J. ;
Akkutlu, I. Y. ;
Sigal, R. F. .
SPE JOURNAL, 2011, 16 (04) :842-855
[28]  
KAPPA, 2019, RUB MULT NUM MOD
[29]   Parametric analysis of technology costs for CO2 storage in saline formations [J].
Kobos, Peter H. ;
Klise, Geoffrey T. ;
Malczynski, Leonard A. ;
Walker, La Tonya N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 54 :574-587
[30]  
Kulga B., 2014, INVESTIGATION CO2 ST