A new methodology to assess the maximum CO2 geosequestration capacity of shale reservoirs with SRV based on wellbore pressure

被引:25
作者
Chu, Hongyang [1 ]
Liao, Xinwei [1 ]
Chen, Zhiming [1 ]
Liu, Wenyuan [1 ]
Mu, Lingyu [1 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Coll Petr Engn, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
CO2 storage capacity; Shale reservoirs; Wellbore pressure; Verification; Sensitivity analysis; ENHANCED GAS RECOVERY; STORAGE CAPACITY; CARBON-DIOXIDE; PORE STRUCTURE; ADSORPTION; SEQUESTRATION; BAKKEN; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcou.2019.06.010
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Shale reservoirs are promising geological sites for CO2 storage due to their high total organic content (TOC) and the large-scale hydraulic fracturing operations. In order to critically evaluate a potential storage reservoir, fast, robust tools are needed to assess the CO2 storage capacity. Based on our previous work, an efficient method based on semi-analytical solution for calculating the maximum CO2 storage capacity in shale formations is derived, based on the injection wellbore pressure. The new methodology fully reflects the flow, diffusion, and adsorption processes of CO2 in shales. It also simulates natural fractures, hydraulic fractures, and the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV). The semi-analytical solution utilizing a Laplace transform and Stehfest numerical inversion is developed to evaluate the wellbore pressure and storage capacity in shale formations, which is verified using numerical simulations. A case study of the derived method on the Bakken Shale shows that the CO2 storage capacity is strongly controlled by the CO2 injection rate, adsorption index, and storage ratio. It is also found that the effective diffusion coefficient and mobility ratio affect the CO2 storage capacity during different periods of the CO2 storage process.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 255
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Alcoser L.A., 2012, SPE HYDR EC EV S
  • [2] Alfarge D, 2017, AB DHAB INT PETR EXH
  • [3] Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part I: New Pore-Scale Considerations
    Ambrose, Ray J.
    Hartman, Robert C.
    Diaz-Campos, Mery
    Akkutlu, I. Yucel
    Sondergeld, Carl H.
    [J]. SPE JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (01): : 219 - 229
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, BAKKEN FORMATION MUC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, EN TECHN TRANS IND S, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264068612-EN
  • [7] Sequestration of CO2 in geological media:: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change
    Bachu, S
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 41 (09) : 953 - 970
  • [8] PHASE-EQUILIBRIA FOR SUPERCRITICAL FLUID PROCESS DESIGN
    BRENNECKE, JF
    ECKERT, CA
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 1989, 35 (09) : 1409 - 1427
  • [9] Bustin R.M., 2008, P SPE SHALE GAS PROD, DOI 10.2118/119892-MS
  • [10] Chen C. M., 2016, SPE J, P1