A consumer perspective on corporate governance in the energy transition: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany

被引:34
作者
Knoefel, Jan [1 ]
Sagebiel, Julian [2 ]
Yildiz, Oezguer [3 ,4 ]
Mueller, Jakob R. [5 ]
Rommel, Jens [6 ]
机构
[1] Inst Ecol Econ Res, Berlin, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Landscape Architecture & Environm Planning, Str 17 Juni 145, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[3] Inter3 Inst Resource Management, Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Environm Econ & Econ Policy, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Erfurt, Fac Econ Law & Social Sci, Erfurt, Germany
[6] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Choice modeling; Electricity; Utilities; Cooperatives; Renewable energy; Consumer preferences; Participation; Willingness to pay; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; COMMUNITY ENERGY; ELECTRICITY; PREFERENCES; PARTICIPATION; HETEROGENEITY; COOPERATIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Numerous countries seek to decarbonize their economy. Previous research has shown that the active involvement of citizens raises the acceptance of change in the energy system. While most studies on citizen participation have focused on citizens as investors, in this paper, we take a consumer perspective. Based on a sample of more than 2000 German electricity consumers, we conduct a Discrete Choice Experiment to estimate willingness to pay for co-determination rights, transparent pricing policies, and an electricity utility's profit distribution. We find large additional willingness to pay for all of these attributes, which, in total, amount to more than a quarter of the overall electricity price per kilowatt hour. Women have a higher willingness to pay of up to one Eurocent per kilowatt hour. We discuss the implications of our findings for Germany's and the European Union's energy policy. Among other things, we conclude that governmental labeling initiatives should include participation-related information to enhance consumer welfare. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 448
页数:9
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Business Strategy and the Environment, DOI [10.1002/bse.522, DOI 10.1002/BSE.522]
[2]   Increasing consumer participation rates for green pricing programs: A choice experiment for South Korea [J].
Bae, Jeong Hwan ;
Rishi, Meenakshi .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 :490-502
[3]   Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of US programs [J].
Banerjee, A ;
Solomon, BD .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (02) :109-123
[4]   What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives [J].
Bauwens, Thomas ;
Gotchev, Boris ;
Holstenkamp, Lars .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 13 :136-147
[5]   Confidence intervals of willingness-to-pay for random coefficient logit models [J].
Bliemer, Michiel C. J. ;
Rose, John M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2013, 58 :199-214
[6]   Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? [J].
Borchers, Allison M. ;
Duke, Joshua M. ;
Parsons, George R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (06) :3327-3334
[7]   Does it matter when a power outage occurs? A choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to avoid power outages [J].
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Martinsson, Peter .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (03) :1232-1245
[8]   ADVANCING THE THEORY OF THE COOPERATIVE ORGANIZATION: THE COOPERATIVE AS A TRUE HYBRID [J].
Chaddad, Fabio .
ANNALS OF PUBLIC AND COOPERATIVE ECONOMICS, 2012, 83 (04) :445-461
[9]   ORGANIZING AROUND TRANSACTION COSTS: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED AND WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? [J].
Crook, T. Russell ;
Combs, James G. ;
Ketchen, David J., Jr. ;
Aguinis, Herman .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (01) :63-79
[10]   A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics [J].
David, RJ ;
Han, SK .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (01) :39-58