A Protocol for Developing a Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Preferences of General Practitioners for the Choice of Specialty

被引:8
作者
Sarikhani, Yaser [1 ]
Ostovar, Tahereh [1 ]
Rossi-Fedele, Giampiero [2 ]
Edirippulige, Sisira [3 ]
Bastani, Peivand [4 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Online Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Management & Med Informat, Hlth Human Recourses Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
discrete choice experiment; general practitioner; preference; protocol; specialty selection; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; HEALTH-CARE; DESIGN; ATTRIBUTES; ECONOMICS; OUTCOMES; CANCER; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2020.12.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) has been increasingly used in studies investigating preferences of the health workforce. This pilot study aimed to provide a comprehensive protocol for design and quality assessment of a DCE to elicit preferences of general practitioners for the choice of specialty. Methods: We conducted 3 rigorous qualitative studies, including a review of literature, qualitative interviews, and focus group discussion to develop attributes and levels of the DCE. Then a D-efficient fractional factorial design was applied to generate choice tasks and to block them into 4 equal versions using SAS software. Two hundred and forty general practitioners participated in a pilot study conducted to evaluate the quality of the instrument using 7 tests. Results: The qualitative studies resulted in the development of 8 attributes and 24 levels. Experimental design led to the generation of 36 choice tasks divided into 4 blocks. The pilot study revealed that the instrument has validity and reliability and also indicated that the design is comprehensible and feasible. Conclusions: This study provided an integrated, comprehensive framework for development and quality assessment of a DCE that could be used in other studies. The pilot study indicated that the instrument is of sufficient quality because it was developed using rigorous qualitative studies and accurate experimental design method.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Developing attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on micro health insurance in rural Malawi [J].
Abiiro, Gilbert Abotisem ;
Leppert, Gerald ;
Mbera, Grace Bongololo ;
Robyn, Paul J. ;
De Allegri, Manuela .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[2]  
Al-Shamsi Mustafa, 2017, J Adv Med Educ Prof, V5, P210
[3]   Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods [J].
Ali, Shehzad ;
Ronaldson, Sarah .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2012, 103 (01) :21-44
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, APPL CHOICE ANAL PRI
[5]  
Arksey H., 2005, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[6]   Development of a Discrete-Choice Experiment (DCE) to Elicit Adolescent and Parent Preferences for Hypodontia Treatment [J].
Barber, Sophy ;
Bekker, Hilary ;
Marti, Joachim ;
Pavitt, Sue ;
Khambay, Balvinder ;
Meads, David .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (01) :137-148
[7]  
Bridges John F P, 2003, Appl Health Econ Health Policy, V2, P213
[8]   Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Mohamed, Ateesha F. ;
Finnern, Henrik W. ;
Woehl, Anette ;
Hauber, A. Brett .
LUNG CANCER, 2012, 77 (01) :224-231
[9]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413
[10]   Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics [J].
Carlsson, F ;
Martinsson, P .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (04) :281-294