Identification of the Most Fragile Component for a Typical RC Bridge Using Seismic Fragility Curves

被引:1
作者
Liu, Yang [1 ]
Lu, Da-Gang [2 ]
Huang, Ming-Gang [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Deep Underground Sci & Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Harbin, Peoples R China
来源
TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE | 2020年 / 27卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
fragile component; numerical simulation; RC continuous girder bridge; seismic fragility; uncertainty; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.17559/TV-20171213122904
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper identifies the most fragile component of a typical reinforced concrete (RC) continuous girder bridge through the seismic fragility analysis. The typical bridge, Liang-Zi River bridge located in Shandong Province of China, is taken as the case study. The Cloud analysis approach is adopted to construct the probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs). Both of the record-to-record uncertainty in ground motions and the structural model uncertainty are considered in the PSDMs by using several approaches such as the selection of real ground motion records from the NGA-West2 database and the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) approach. The damage limit states defined refer to piers and bearings which are commonly regarded as the fragile components. Furthermore, the seismic fragility curves of components and the bridge system are developed. Results show that the middle piers are more fragile than the side piers; the bearings are more fragile than piers; it is different from experiences that the fixed bearings at the top of the middle pier are not always more fragile than sliding bearings at both of the transverse and longitudinal loading conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 52
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], B02012008 JTGT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, D622004 JTG
[3]  
Baker J.W., 2011, NEW GROUND MOTION SE
[4]  
CALTRANS, 2001, SEISM DES CRIT VERS
[5]   Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines [J].
Cornell, CA ;
Jalayer, F ;
Hamburger, RO ;
Foutch, DA .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (04) :526-533
[6]   PEER Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology, Revisited [J].
Guenay, Selim ;
Mosalam, Khalid M. .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2013, 17 (06) :829-858
[7]  
Hwang H., 2000, J BRIDGE ENG, V5, P322, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(322)
[8]  
Iman Ronald L., 2008, Ency. Quant. Risk Anal. Assess., V3, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470061596.RISK0299
[9]   Analytical fragility assessment using unscaled ground motion records [J].
Jalayer, Fatemeh ;
Ebrahimian, Hossein ;
Miano, Andrea ;
Manfredi, Gaetano ;
Sezen, Halil .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (15) :2639-2663
[10]   Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation [J].
Karim, KR ;
Yamazaki, F .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 30 (12) :1839-1856