Analysis of testosterone suppression in men receiving histrelin, a novel GnRH agonist for the treatment of prostate cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Djavan, Bob [1 ]
Schlegel, Peter [2 ]
Salomon, Georg [3 ]
Eckersberger, Elisabeth [1 ]
Sadri, Helen [1 ]
Graefen, Markus [3 ]
机构
[1] New York Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[3] Hamburg Eppendorf Univ Hosp, Prostate Canc Ctr UKE, Martini Hosp, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
prostate cancer; hormone therapy; histrelin; testosterone; prostate-specific antigen; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY; CASTRATE LEVELS; HORMONE; IMPLANT; EFFICACY; ACETATE; SAFETY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard care in men with advanced prostate cancer. Continuous testosterone suppression is essential to treatment efficacy. Recently a 1 year depot compound histrelin, (VANTAS; Orion Pharmaceuticals, Finland; Endo Pharmaceuticals, USA), a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog, was approved for hormone therapy of prostate cancer. In the present study the therapeutic efficacy of this compound was investigated, in addition to its impact on testosterone values and velocity as well as PSA. Method: One hundred thirty-one patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer and normal testosterone levels were prospectively evaluated over 1 year. Androgen deprivation therapy was performed using a once yearly implant of the GnRH agonist histrelin. Testosterone and PSA levels, and histrelin serum profile were measured prospectively every month for 1 year. In addition, patients were stratified according to their PSA results and D'Amico risk profile. Results: Testosterone suppression (testosterone <= 50 ng/dL) was measured in all patients between weeks 4 and 52; 88% of patients had a continuous testosterone level under 20 ng/dL. The PSA level in the total population decreased significantly within the first 2 weeks compared with baseline, and after 52 weeks the median PSA level of the total population was 0.2 ng/mL. PSA responses were grouped into three typical therapeutic outcomes and correlated with the clinical risk distribution, and levels were lowered in all three risk groups. Conclusion: The GnRH agonist histrelin successfully suppressed testosterone over the entire study period. This effect was measured across a number of different clinical definitions of PSA response and clinical risk. The GnRH agonist therefore offers an effective therapy option in hormone treatment of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:5265 / 5271
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testosterone castration levels in patients with prostate cancer: Is there a difference between GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist? Primary results of an open-label randomized control study
    Mytilekas, Vaios-Konstantinos
    Papaefstathiou, Efstathios
    Koukourikis, Periklis
    Ouzounidis, Xenofon
    Kazantzidis, Stavros
    Hatzimouratidis, Konstantinos
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 64 (06) : 572 - 578
  • [2] Efficacy of treatment with a GnRH antagonist in prostate cancer patients previously treated with a GnRH agonist
    Ezaki, Taisuke
    Kosaka, Takeo
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Shinojima, Toshiaki
    Kikuchi, Eiji
    Miyajima, Akira
    Oya, Mototsugu
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 76 (02) : 301 - 306
  • [3] Efficacy of treatment with a GnRH antagonist in prostate cancer patients previously treated with a GnRH agonist
    Taisuke Ezaki
    Takeo Kosaka
    Ryuichi Mizuno
    Toshiaki Shinojima
    Eiji Kikuchi
    Akira Miyajima
    Mototsugu Oya
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2015, 76 : 301 - 306
  • [4] FSH suppression and tumour control in patients with prostate cancer during androgen deprivation with a GnRH agonist or antagonist
    Crawford, E. David
    Tombal, B.
    Keane, T.
    Boccardo, F.
    Miller, K.
    Shore, N.
    Moul, J. W.
    Damber, J-E
    Collette, L.
    Persson, B-E
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (5-6) : 349 - 357
  • [5] A review of the use of histrelin acetate in the treatment of prostate cancer
    Crawford, E. David
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 : 14 - 22
  • [6] An evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the histrelin implant for the palliative treatment of prostate cancer
    Dineen, MK
    Tierney, DS
    Kuzma, P
    Pentikis, HS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 45 (11) : 1245 - 1249
  • [7] Testosterone Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer
    Kaplan, Alan L.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Morgentaler, Abraham
    Mulhall, John P.
    Schulman, Claude C.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (05) : 894 - 903
  • [8] GnRH antagonists in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer
    Pommerville, Peter J.
    de Boer, Johan G.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : 5063 - 5070
  • [9] GNRH-agonist or antagonist in the treatment of prostate cancer: a comparision based on oncological results
    Salciccia, Stefano
    Gentilucci, Alessandro
    Cattarino, Susanna
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2016, 83 (04) : 173 - 178
  • [10] The Impact of Late Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonist Dosing on Testosterone Suppression in Patients with Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of United States Clinical Data
    Crawford, E. David
    Twardowski, Przemyslaw W.
    Concepcion, Raoul S.
    Hafron, Jason M.
    Harris, Richard G.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Gordan, Lucio N.
    Petrylak, Daniel P.
    Atkinson, Stuart N.
    Boldt-Houle, Deborah M.
    Keane, Thomas E.
    Higano, Celestia S.
    Henderson, R. Jonathan
    Kader, A. Karim
    Hussain, Maha H.
    Shore, Neal D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (04) : 743 - 750