Midterm Survivorship of Robotic-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

被引:12
作者
Heckmann, Nathanael D. [1 ]
Antonios, Joseph K. [1 ]
Chen, Xiao T. [2 ]
Kang, Hyunwoo P. [1 ]
Chung, Brian C. [1 ]
Piple, Amit S. [1 ]
Christ, Alexander B. [1 ]
Gilbert, Paul K. [1 ]
机构
[1] USC, Keck Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90333 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; lateral osteoarthritis; lateral UKA; robotic-assisted; valgus alignment; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; MATCHED PATIENTS; FORGOTTEN JOINT; REPLACEMENT; ALIGNMENT; SATISFACTION; VALIDATION; ENGLAND; HIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.023
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a popular alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Few studies have investigated outcomes following robotic-assisted lateral UKA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-assisted lateral UKA. Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted on all robotic-assisted lateral UK As performed by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2019. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and Kozinn and Scott criteria were collected. Implant survivorship was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with all-cause reoperation and conversion to TKA as endpoints. Participating patients were assessed for patient satisfaction and the Forgotten Joint Score-12. Correlations between patient demographics and patient outcome scores were investigated. Results: In total, 120 lateral UK As were identified, 84 of which met inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (range 2.0-7.0). Five-year survivorship was 92.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84.5-96.7) with all-cause reoperation as the endpoint, and 100% (95% CI 95.0-100) with conversion to TKA as the endpoint. One patient was converted to TKA after the 5-year mark, resulting in a 6-year survival for conversion to TKA of 88.9% (95% CI 44.9-98.5). Average Forgotten Joint Score-12 score was 82.7/100, and patient satisfaction 4.7/5. Mean coronal plane correction was 2.5 degrees +/- 1.9 degrees toward the mechanical axis. Neither final postoperative alignment nor failure to meet classic Kozinn and Scott criteria for UKA resulted in differences in patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates high mid-term survivorship and excellent patient-reported outcomes with robotic-assisted lateral UKA. Robotic-assisted lateral UKA is a viable treatment option for isolated lateral compartment arthritis even in patients who do not meet classic indications. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 836
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    van der List, Jelle P.
    Lee, Lily
    Coon, Thomas M.
    Borus, Todd A.
    Roche, Martin W.
    KNEE, 2017, 24 (02) : 419 - 428
  • [22] Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: historical perspectives and current innovations
    Kim, Sung Eun
    Han, Hyuk-Soo
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING LETTERS, 2023, 13 (04) : 543 - 552
  • [23] Similar survivorship at the 5-year follow-up comparing robotic-assisted and conventional lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Guido Maritan
    Giorgio Franceschi
    Roberto Nardacchione
    Emanuele Furlan
    Ilaria Mariani
    Nicola Ursino
    Riccardo D’Ambrosi
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 1063 - 1071
  • [24] Comparison of Patient Demographics and Utilization Trends of Robotic-Assisted and Non-Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Vakharia, Rushabh M.
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Cohen-Levy, Wayne B.
    Vakharia, Ajit M.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Roche, Martin W.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (06) : 621 - 627
  • [25] Faster return to sport after robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparative study
    Canetti, R.
    Batailler, C.
    Bankhead, C.
    Neyret, P.
    Servien, E.
    Lustig, S.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2018, 138 (12) : 1765 - 1771
  • [26] Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: State-of-the Art and Review of the Literature
    Christ, Alexander B.
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    Mayman, David J.
    Haas, Steven B.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (07) : 1994 - 2001
  • [27] A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
    Manara, J. R.
    Nixon, M.
    Tippett, B.
    Pretty, W.
    Collopy, D.
    Clark, G. W.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (12): : 1123 - 1129
  • [28] Robotic Lateral and Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Augart, Marco A.
    Plate, Johannes F.
    Bracey, Daniel N.
    Jinnah, Alex
    Poehling, Gary G.
    Jinnah, Riyaz H.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 25 (02) : 95 - 103
  • [29] Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves functional outcomes, complications, and revisions
    Bensa, A.
    Sangiorgio, A.
    Deabate, L.
    Illuminati, A.
    Pompa, B.
    Filardo, G.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (05): : 374 - 384
  • [30] Lateral Robotic Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Thein, Ran
    Khamaisy, Saker
    Zuiderbaan, Hendrik A.
    Nawabi, Danyal H.
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2014, 22 (04) : 223 - 228