Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women

被引:252
作者
Vaes, Jeroen [1 ]
Paladino, Paola [2 ]
Puvia, Elisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Psicol Sviluppo & Socializzaz, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Trento, Dept Cognit Sci & Educ, Roverto, Italy
关键词
IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; SELF-OBJECTIFICATION; SEX-DIFFERENCES; ATTRACTIVENESS; CONSEQUENCES; ESSENTIALISM; ATTRIBUTION; PREJUDICE; EMOTIONS; INGROUPS;
D O I
10.1002/ejsp.824
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Focusing on the dehumanization of sexually objectified targets, study 1 tested the extent to which objectified and non-objectified male and female publicity photos were associated with human compared to animal concepts. Results confirmed the hypothesis that, among all targets, only objectified women were associated with less human concepts. This pattern of results emerged for both male and female participants but likely for different reasons. Study 2 directly looked at female and male participants' affinity with sexually objectified women. Results indicated that the more women distanced themselves from sexually objectified women the more they dehumanized them, whereas men's sexual attraction moderated their tendency to dehumanize female targets. In study 3, this latter motivation was operationalized as the activation of a sex goal and showed to trigger man's but not woman's dehumanization of female targets. Overall, the present set of studies show that only sexually objectified women are dehumanized by both men and women but for different reasons. Whereas sexual attraction shifts a men's focus of a female target away from her personality onto her body triggering a dehumanization process, women are more inclined to dehumanize their sexually objectified counterparts the more they distance themselves from these sexualized representations of their gender category. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 785
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   FACE-ISM - 5 STUDIES OF SEX-DIFFERENCES IN FACIAL PROMINENCE [J].
ARCHER, D ;
IRITANI, B ;
KIMES, DD ;
BARRIOS, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 45 (04) :725-735
[2]   ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE UNDERLING - AN AUTOMATIC POWER-]SEX ASSOCIATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND AGGRESSION [J].
BARGH, JA ;
RAYMOND, P ;
PRYER, JB ;
STRACK, F .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (05) :768-781
[3]  
Bartky S.L., 2015, Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression
[5]   The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders [J].
Calogero, RM ;
Davis, WN ;
Thompson, JK .
SEX ROLES, 2005, 52 (1-2) :43-50
[6]   From Agents to Objects: Sexist Attitudes and Neural Responses to Sexualized Targets [J].
Cikara, Mina ;
Eberhardt, Jennifer L. ;
Fiske, Susan T. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (03) :540-551
[7]   Objectification theory - Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks [J].
Fredrickson, BL ;
Roberts, TA .
PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 1997, 21 (02) :173-206
[8]   Dimensions of mind perception [J].
Gray, Heather M. ;
Gray, Kurt ;
Wegner, Daniel M. .
SCIENCE, 2007, 315 (5812) :619-619
[9]   Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm [J].
Greenwald, AG ;
Nosek, BA ;
Banaji, MR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (02) :197-216
[10]   Power and the objectification of social targets [J].
Gruenfeld, Deborah H. ;
Inesi, M. Ena ;
Magee, Joe C. ;
Galinsky, Adam D. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (01) :111-127