Concept selection for phenotypes and diseases using learn to rank

被引:11
作者
Collier, Nigel [1 ,2 ]
Oellrich, Anika [3 ]
Groza, Tudor [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[2] European Bioinformat Inst EMBL EBI, Cambridge, England
[3] Wellcome Trust Sanger Inst, Cambridge, England
[4] Garvan Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
BIOMEDICAL CONCEPT RECOGNITION; ONTOLOGY; EXTRACTION; TOOL; INFORMATION; SYSTEM; TEXT;
D O I
10.1186/s13326-015-0019-z
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Phenotypes form the basis for determining the existence of a disease against the given evidence. Much of this evidence though remains locked away in text - scientific articles, clinical trial reports and electronic patient records (EPR) - where authors use the full expressivity of human language to report their observations. Results: In this paper we exploit a combination of off-the-shelf tools for extracting a machine understandable representation of phenotypes and other related concepts that concern the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. These are tested against a gold standard EPR collection that has been annotated with Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concept identifiers: the ShARE/CLEF 2013 corpus for disorder detection. We evaluate four pipelines as stand-alone systems and then attempt to optimise semantic-type based performance using several learn-to-rank (LTR) approaches - three pairwise and one listwise. We observed that whilst overall Apache cTAKES tended to outperform other stand-alone systems on a strong recall (R = 0.57), precision was low (P = 0.09) leading to low-to-moderate F1 measure (F1 = 0.16). Moreover, there is substantial variation in system performance across semantic types for disorders. For example, the concept Findings (T033) seemed to be very challenging for all systems. Combining systems within LTR improved F1 substantially (F1 = 0.24) particularly for Disease or syndrome (T047) and Anatomical abnormality (T190). Whilst recall is improved markedly, precision remains a challenge (P = 0.15, R = 0.59).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Journal of machine learning research
[2]  
Aronson AR, 2001, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, P17
[3]   Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology [J].
Ashburner, M ;
Ball, CA ;
Blake, JA ;
Botstein, D ;
Butler, H ;
Cherry, JM ;
Davis, AP ;
Dolinski, K ;
Dwight, SS ;
Eppig, JT ;
Harris, MA ;
Hill, DP ;
Issel-Tarver, L ;
Kasarskis, A ;
Lewis, S ;
Matese, JC ;
Richardson, JE ;
Ringwald, M ;
Rubin, GM ;
Sherlock, G .
NATURE GENETICS, 2000, 25 (01) :25-29
[4]  
Burges C., 2005, ICML
[5]  
Cao Z., 2007, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, V227, P129, DOI 10.1145/1273496.1273513
[6]   A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries [J].
Chapman, WW ;
Bridewell, W ;
Hanbury, P ;
Cooper, GF ;
Buchanan, BG .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2001, 34 (05) :301-310
[7]  
Chen Z., 2011, Proc. of the 2011 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process, P771
[8]   Toward knowledge support for analysis and interpretation of complex traits [J].
Collier, Nigel ;
Oellrich, Anika ;
Groza, Tudor .
GENOME BIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (09)
[9]   Learning to Recognize Phenotype Candidates in the Auto-Immune Literature Using SVM Re-Ranking [J].
Collier, Nigel ;
Mai-vu Tran ;
Hoang-quynh Le ;
Quang-Thuy Ha ;
Oellrich, Anika ;
Rebholz-Schuhmann, Dietrich .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10)
[10]   UMLS content views appropriate for NLP processing of the biomedical literature vs. clinical text [J].
Demner-Fushman, Dina ;
Mork, James G. ;
Shooshan, Sonya E. ;
Aronson, Alan R. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2010, 43 (04) :587-594