Coaxial 3D bioprinting of tri-polymer scaffolds to improve the osteogenic and vasculogenic potential of cells in co-culture models

被引:22
|
作者
Shahabipour, Fahimeh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tavafoghi, Maryam [4 ,5 ]
Aninwene, George E. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Bonakdar, Shahin [1 ]
Oskuee, Reza Kazemi [7 ]
Shokrgozar, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
Potyondy, Tyler [4 ,5 ]
Alambeigi, Farshid [8 ]
Ahadian, Samad [9 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Skin Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Pasteur Inst Iran, Natl Cell Bank Iran, Tehran, Iran
[3] MIT, Harvard MIT Div Hlth Sci & Technol, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Bioengn, Henry Samueli Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Minimally Invas Therapeut C MIT, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Calif NanoSyst Inst CNSI, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Biomed Appl Res Ctr, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[8] Univ Texas Austin, Walker Dept Mech Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[9] Terasaki Inst Biomed Innovat, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
3D co-culture; bone; osteon; core-shell; 3D bioprinting; coaxial bioprinting; MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN-2 DELIVERY; METHACRYLATED GELATIN; ALGINATE HYDROGELS; CONSTRUCTS; FABRICATION; TISSUES;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.a.37354
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The crosstalk between osteoblasts and endothelial cells is critical for bone vascularization and regeneration. Here, we used a coaxial 3D bioprinting method to directly print an osteon-like structure by depositing angiogenic and osteogenic bioinks from the core and shell regions of the coaxial nozzle, respectively. The bioinks were made up of gelatin, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), alginate, and hydroxyapatite (HAp) nanoparticles and were loaded with human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) and osteoblasts (MC3T3) in the core and shell regions, respectively. Conventional monoaxial 3D bioprinting was used as a control method, where the hydrogels, HAp nanoparticles, MC3T3 cells, and HUVECs were all mixed in one bioink and printed from the core nozzle. As a result, the bioprinted scaffolds were composed of cell-laden fibers with either a core-shell or homogenous structure, providing a non-contact (indirect) or contact (direct) co-culture of MC3T3 cells and HUVECs, respectively. Both structures supported the 3D culture of HUVECs and osteoblasts over a long period. The scaffolds also supported the expression of osteogenic and angiogenic factors. However, the gene expression was significantly higher for the core-shell structure than the homogeneous structure due to the well-defined distribution of osteoblasts and endothelial cells and the formation of vessel-like structures in the co-culture system. Our results indicated that the coaxial bioprinting technique, with the ability to create a non-contact co-culture of cells, can provide a more efficient bioprinting strategy for printing highly vascularized and bioactive bone structures.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1089
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro evaluation of 3D bioprinted tri-polymer network scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration
    Bendtsen, Stephanie T.
    Wei, Mei
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2017, 105 (12) : 3262 - 3272
  • [2] From 2D to 3D Co-Culture Systems: A Review of Co-Culture Models to Study the Neural Cells Interaction
    Liu, Rongrong
    Meng, Xiaoting
    Yu, Xiyao
    Wang, Guoqiang
    Dong, Zhiyong
    Zhou, Zhengjie
    Qi, Mingran
    Yu, Xiao
    Ji, Tong
    Wang, Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (21)
  • [3] Bi-compartmental 3D scaffolds for the co-culture of intervertebral disk cells and mesenchymal stem cells
    Kook, Yun-Min
    Kang, Young Mi
    Moon, Seong Hwan
    Koh, Won-Gun
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2016, 38 : 113 - 122
  • [4] 3D co-culture of human endothelial cells and myofibroblasts
    Pullens, R. A. A.
    Stekelenburg, M.
    Bouten, C. V. C.
    Baaijens, F. P. T.
    Post, M. J.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2007, 13 (07): : 1635 - 1635
  • [5] 3D Bioprinting a Novel Skin Co-Culture Model Using Human Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts
    Andrade, Thiago A. M.
    da Silva, Victor Allisson
    Scheck, Kali
    Garay, Tania
    Sharma, Ruchi
    Willerth, Stephanie M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2025, 113 (01)
  • [6] Micro-Vessels-Like 3D Scaffolds for Studying the Proton Radiobiology of Glioblastoma-Endothelial Cells Co-Culture Models
    Akolawala, Qais
    Keuning, Floor
    Rovituso, Marta
    van Burik, Wouter
    van der Wal, Ernst
    Versteeg, Henri H.
    Rondon, Araci M. R.
    Accardo, Angelo
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [7] Prevascularization of 3D printed bone scaffolds by bioactive hydrogels and cell co-culture
    Kuss, Mitchell A.
    Wu, Shaohua
    Wang, Ying
    Untrauer, Jason B.
    Li, Wenlong
    Lim, Jung Yul
    Duan, Bin
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2018, 106 (05) : 1788 - 1798
  • [8] Development of 3D co-culture of aligned glial cells in nanofibre scaffolds for implantation into neural injury sites
    Weightman, A.
    Pickard, M.
    Jenkins, S.
    Chari, D.
    Yang, Y.
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 6 : 88 - 89
  • [9] A compartmental 3D scaffold fabrication and alignment device for neurovascular co-culture and tri-culture
    Ersoy, Fulya
    Sokullu, Emel
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2019, 5 (03):
  • [10] 3D co-culture of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells in collagen scaffolds as a model of the hematopoietic niche
    Leisten, Isabelle
    Kramann, Rafael
    Ferreiraa, Monica S. Ventura
    Bovi, Manfred
    Neuss, Sabine
    Ziegler, Patrick
    Wagner, Wolfgang
    Knuechel, Ruth
    Schneider, Rebekka K.
    BIOMATERIALS, 2012, 33 (06) : 1736 - 1747