Methanol fuel production, utilization, and techno-economy: a review

被引:118
作者
Deka, Tanmay J. [1 ,2 ]
Osman, Ahmed I. [1 ]
Baruah, Debendra C. [2 ]
Rooney, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, David Keir Bldg,Stranmillis Rd, Belfast BT9 5AG, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Tezpur Univ, Dept Energy, Energy Conservat Lab, Sonitpur 784028, Assam, India
关键词
Biomass; Biomethanol; Methanol production; Dual fuel; Future generation fuel; Techno-economic analysis; BIOMASS-TO-METHANOL; CARBON-DIOXIDE HYDROGENATION; TEMPERATURE CO-ELECTROLYSIS; AIR-STEAM GASIFICATION; DIMETHYL ETHER DME; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; BIOMETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; SYNGAS PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10311-022-01485-y
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Climate change and the unsustainability of fossil fuels are calling for cleaner energies such as methanol as a fuel. Methanol is one of the simplest molecules for energy storage and is utilized to generate a wide range of products. Since methanol can be produced from biomass, numerous countries could produce and utilize biomethanol. Here, we review methanol production processes, techno-economy, and environmental viability. Lignocellulosic biomass with a high cellulose and hemicellulose content is highly suitable for gasification-based biomethanol production. Compared to fossil fuels, the combustion of biomethanol reduces nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 80%, carbon dioxide emissions by up to 95%, and eliminates sulphur oxide emission. The cost and yield of biomethanol largely depend on feedstock characteristics, initial investment, and plant location. The use of biomethanol as complementary fuel with diesel, natural gas, and dimethyl ether is beneficial in terms of fuel economy, thermal efficiency, and reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:3525 / 3554
页数:30
相关论文
共 218 条
[1]  
Abdi H, 2017, DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SYSTEMS: DESIGN, OPERATION AND GRID INTEGRATION, P221, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-804208-3.00005-4
[2]   Effects of Temperature and Equivalence Ratio on Pine Syngas Primary Gases and Contaminants in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Gasifier [J].
Abdoulmoumine, Nourredine ;
Kulkarni, Avanti ;
Adhikari, Sushil .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2014, 53 (14) :5767-5777
[3]   Recent trends in photocatalytic materials for reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol [J].
Adekoya, David ;
Tahir, Muhammad ;
Amin, Nor Aishah Saidina .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 116
[4]  
Akhoondi A., 2021, Synthesis and Sintering Jun, V1, P105, DOI [10.53063/synsint.2021.1229, DOI 10.53063/SYNSINT.2021.1229]
[5]   Production of syngas via gasification using optimum blends of biomass [J].
AlNouss, Ahmed ;
McKay, Gordon ;
Al-Ansari, Tareq .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 242
[6]   A techno-economic-environmental study evaluating the potential of oxygen-steam biomass gasification for the generation of value-added products [J].
AlNouss, Ahmed ;
McKay, Gordon ;
Al-Ansari, Tareq .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 196 :664-676
[7]   Biomethanol production from gasification of non-woody plant in South Africa: Optimum scale and economic performance [J].
Amigun, Bamikole ;
Gorgens, Johann ;
Knoetze, Hansie .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (01) :312-322
[8]   Co-gasification of black liquor and pyrolysis oil: Evaluation of blend ratios and methanol production capacities [J].
Anderson, Jin ;
Furusjo, Erik ;
Wetterlund, Elisabeth ;
Lundgren, Joakim ;
Landalv, Ingvar .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 110 :240-248
[9]   Co-gasification of pyrolysis oil and black liquor for methanol production [J].
Andersson, Jim ;
Lundgren, Joakim ;
Furusjo, Erik ;
Landalv, Ingvar .
FUEL, 2015, 158 :451-459
[10]   Comparison between two methods of methanol production from carbon dioxide [J].
Anicic, B. ;
Trop, P. ;
Goricanec, D. .
ENERGY, 2014, 77 :279-289