Pinpointing optimized air quality model performance over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: Mosaic approach

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Yali [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Jiajia [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxi [1 ]
Zuo, Penglai [1 ]
Wang, Chenlong [1 ]
Wu, Kai [3 ]
Yang, Siyuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Municipal Inst Labour Protect, Dept Air Pollut Control, Beijing 100054, Peoples R China
[2] Ocean Univ China, Minist Educ, Key Lab Marine Environm Sci & Ecol, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Beijing Inst Metrol, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Land surface model; Mosaic approach; PM2.5; WRF-CMAQ; LAND-SURFACE HETEROGENEITY; URBAN CANOPY MODEL; PART I; IMPACT; WIND; HAZE; IMPLEMENTATION; SIMULATION; POLLUTION; SCHEMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apr.2021.101207
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mosaic approach, with certain number of tiles representing land use (LU) types in each grid cell, had been implemented into WRF-Noah model. Previous studies found mosaic approach had a better performance on meteorological parameters than only considering dominant LU in dominant approach. In this study, the impacts of mosaic approach on meteorological parameters and air quality were investigated in WRF-CMAQ over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region in China in 2020. Results showed that mosaic approach improved the simulation results of WS10 (surface wind speed at 10 m), T2 (temperature at 2 m), and RH (relative humidity) especially in nighttime in winter and were available for all stations with different percent of urban area. "MOS_TOPO" scenario, which coupled with mosaic approach and "topo-wind" schemes, obtained best simulation results of WS10 and T2 in January among six scenarios, with the lower average Root Mean Square Error of WS10 (1.18 m/s) and Mean Bias of T2 (0.55 degrees C) for all stations. Meanwhile, mosaic approach obtained lower vertical bar NMB vertical bar of PM2.5 than dominant approach in more than 69% cities in BTH region. Cities in southern Hebei province, especially Xingtai city, were identified as the most sensitive area for PM2.5 simulation affected by mosaic approach. Although the mosaic approach has improved the simulation results of meteorological parameters, especially the nighttime simulation results of WS10, there is still some deviation in the simulation results of PM2.5. Accurate emission inventory, suitable physics option in numerical weather model and rational chemical mechanism in air quality model are the important factors for WRF-CMAQ.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Industrial Structure and Water Use in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region: A Multiplier Analysis
    Lin, Xiao-xia
    Sha, Jing-hua
    Jiang, Rui-ju
    Yan, Jing-jing
    Zhong, Shuai
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-COMMERCE AND CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ECED 2017), 2017, : 367 - 372
  • [42] Interdecadal Variation of Summer Extreme Heat Events in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
    Liang, Yanan
    Zhang, Junzhi
    Wang, Ji
    Xie, Tiejun
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [43] Characteristics of size-segregated carbonaceous aerosols in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
    Guo, Yuhong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (14) : 13918 - 13930
  • [44] Predictability of the winter haze pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in the context of stringent emission control
    Zhang, Ziyin
    Zhao, Xiujuan
    Mao, Rui
    Xu, Jing
    Kim, Seong-Joong
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (05)
  • [45] Research on Influential Factors of PM2.5 within the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in China
    Li, Jinchao
    Chen, Lin
    Xiang, Yuwei
    Xu, Ming
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 2018
  • [46] Assessing air-quality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: The method and mixed tales of PM2.5 and O3
    Chen, Lei
    Guo, Bin
    Huang, Jiasheng
    He, Jing
    Wang, Hengfang
    Zhang, Shuyi
    Chen, Song Xi
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 193 : 290 - 301
  • [47] Quantifying public health benefits of environmental strategy of PM2.5 air quality management in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China
    Chen, Li
    Shit, Mengshuang
    Li, Suhuan
    Gao, Shuang
    Zhang, Hui
    Sun, Yanling
    Mao, Jian
    Bai, Zhipeng
    Wang, Zhongliang
    Zhou, Jiang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2017, 57 : 33 - 40
  • [48] The contribution of residential coal combustion to PM2.5 pollution over China's Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in winter
    Zhang, Zhongzhi
    Wang, Wenxing
    Cheng, Miaomiao
    Liu, Shijie
    Xu, Jun
    He, Youjiang
    Meng, Fan
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 159 : 147 - 161
  • [49] Model Simulations and Predictions of Hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS) in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China: Roles of Aqueous Aerosols and Atmospheric Acidity
    Wang, Haoqi
    Li, Jiacheng
    Wu, Ting
    Ma, Tao
    Wei, Lianfang
    Zhang, Hailiang
    Yang, Xi
    Munger, J. William
    Duan, Feng-Kui
    Zhang, Yufen
    Feng, Yinchang
    Zhang, Qiang
    Sun, Yele
    Fu, Pingqing
    McElroy, Michael B.
    Song, Shaojie
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 58 (03) : 1589 - 1600
  • [50] Correlating PM2.5 concentrations with air pollutant emissions: A longitudinal study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    Shi, Minjun
    Li, Yuanjie
    Pang, Rui
    Xiang, Nan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 179 : 103 - 113