Pinpointing optimized air quality model performance over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: Mosaic approach

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Yali [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Jiajia [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxi [1 ]
Zuo, Penglai [1 ]
Wang, Chenlong [1 ]
Wu, Kai [3 ]
Yang, Siyuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Municipal Inst Labour Protect, Dept Air Pollut Control, Beijing 100054, Peoples R China
[2] Ocean Univ China, Minist Educ, Key Lab Marine Environm Sci & Ecol, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Beijing Inst Metrol, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Land surface model; Mosaic approach; PM2.5; WRF-CMAQ; LAND-SURFACE HETEROGENEITY; URBAN CANOPY MODEL; PART I; IMPACT; WIND; HAZE; IMPLEMENTATION; SIMULATION; POLLUTION; SCHEMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apr.2021.101207
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mosaic approach, with certain number of tiles representing land use (LU) types in each grid cell, had been implemented into WRF-Noah model. Previous studies found mosaic approach had a better performance on meteorological parameters than only considering dominant LU in dominant approach. In this study, the impacts of mosaic approach on meteorological parameters and air quality were investigated in WRF-CMAQ over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region in China in 2020. Results showed that mosaic approach improved the simulation results of WS10 (surface wind speed at 10 m), T2 (temperature at 2 m), and RH (relative humidity) especially in nighttime in winter and were available for all stations with different percent of urban area. "MOS_TOPO" scenario, which coupled with mosaic approach and "topo-wind" schemes, obtained best simulation results of WS10 and T2 in January among six scenarios, with the lower average Root Mean Square Error of WS10 (1.18 m/s) and Mean Bias of T2 (0.55 degrees C) for all stations. Meanwhile, mosaic approach obtained lower vertical bar NMB vertical bar of PM2.5 than dominant approach in more than 69% cities in BTH region. Cities in southern Hebei province, especially Xingtai city, were identified as the most sensitive area for PM2.5 simulation affected by mosaic approach. Although the mosaic approach has improved the simulation results of meteorological parameters, especially the nighttime simulation results of WS10, there is still some deviation in the simulation results of PM2.5. Accurate emission inventory, suitable physics option in numerical weather model and rational chemical mechanism in air quality model are the important factors for WRF-CMAQ.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can forest city construction affect urban air quality? The evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration of China
    Xu, Chang
    Dong, Liang
    Yu, Chang
    Zhang, Yingjie
    Cheng, Baodong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
  • [22] The air quality of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regions around the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meetings
    Sheng, Li
    Lu, Kai
    Ma, Xin
    Hu, Jiang-kai
    Song, Zhen-xin
    Huang, Shun-xiang
    Zhang, Ji-ping
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 6 (06) : 1066 - 1072
  • [23] An analysis of the urbanization contribution to observed terrestrial stilling in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China
    Wang, Jun
    Feng, Jinming
    Yan, Zhongwei
    Qiu, Yuan
    Cao, Lijuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (03)
  • [24] Impacts of compound extreme weather events on summer ozone in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
    Lu, Peilan
    Liu, Run
    Luo, Zheng
    Li, Shiyi
    Wu, Yanxing
    Hu, Wenzhao
    Xue, Xin
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (03)
  • [25] The Effects of Anthropogenic Heat Release on Urban Meteorology and Implication for Haze Pollution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
    Liu, Ruiting
    Han, Zhiwei
    ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2016, 2016
  • [26] Has air pollution emission level in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region peaked? A panel data analysis
    Meng, Ming
    Zhou, Jin
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 119
  • [27] Spatial and temporal analyses of air pollutants and meteorological driving forces in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China
    Hu, Zizhan
    Tang, Xuguang
    Zheng, Chen
    Guan, Menglin
    Shen, Jingwei
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 77 (14)
  • [28] Development of an integrated machine learning model to improve the secondary inorganic aerosol simulation over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
    Ding, Ning
    Tang, Xiao
    Wu, Huangjian
    Kong, Lei
    Dao, Xu
    Wang, Zifa
    Zhu, Jiang
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 327
  • [29] Estimation of All-Day Aerosol Optical Depth in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region Using Ground Air Quality Data
    Zhang, Wenhao
    Liu, Sijia
    Chen, Xiaoyang
    Mi, Xiaofei
    Gu, Xingfa
    Yu, Tao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [30] Impacts of LULC, FDDA, Topo-wind and UCM schemes on WRF-CMAQ over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China
    Wang, Kun
    Tong, Yali
    Gao, Jiajia
    Gao, Chao
    Wu, Kai
    Yue, Tao
    Qin, Sida
    Wang, Chenlong
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (02) : 292 - 304