Human error risk management methodology for safety audit of a large railway organisation

被引:25
作者
Cacciabue, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Protect & Secur Citizen, I-21020 Ispra, Italy
关键词
rail human factors; recurrent safety audit; modelling human machine interaction; field studies;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2005.04.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper considers the application of the human error risk management for engineering systems (HERMES) methodology for safety assessment studies. The application concerns the recurrent safety audits (RSA) of a large organisation in the domain of railway transportation systems. The objective of the study was the identification of the most relevant areas of intervention for improving safety and reliability of the service. The methodology has been applied to the whole organisation and its working processes. Specific attention was paid to train drivers. A number of critical indicators of safety and recurrent safety audit matrices were identified, which enabled the assessment of the safety level of the organisation and the generation of safety recommendations. The application of HERMES to this case study shows that the methodology is applicable in practice and can give valuable and significant results. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 718
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Cacciabue P.C., 2004, GUIDE APPLYING HUMAN
[2]   Human error risk management for engineering systems: a methodology for design, safety assessment, accident investigation and training [J].
Cacciabue, PC .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 83 (02) :229-240
[3]  
Edwards E., 1988, Human factors in aviation, P3
[4]  
*ICAO, 1992, 238AN143 ICAO
[5]  
ICAO, 1993, Circular 240-AN/144
[6]  
Kirwan B., 1992, A guide to task analysis
[7]  
REASON J, 1997, MANAGING RISKS ORG A
[8]  
Swain A.D., 1983, NUREGCR1278
[9]  
Wiener E.L., 1995, Cockpit Resource Management
[10]  
WILSON JR, 2001, INT J COGNITION TECH