Wikipedia and academic peer review - Wikipedia as a recognised medium for scholarly publication?

被引:39
作者
Black, Erik W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Sch Teaching & Learning, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
peer review; knowledge creation; publications; online operations;
D O I
10.1108/14684520810865994
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to engage in a thought experiment, exploring the use of Wikipedia or similar content-malleable systems for the review and dissemination of academic knowledge. Design/methodology/approach - By looking at other sources, the paper considers the current state of the academic peer-review process, discusses Wikipedia and reflects on dynamic content creation and management applications currently in use in academia. Findings - The traditional peer review process must be updated to match the rapid creation and diffusion of knowledge that characterises the 21st century. The Wikipedia concept is a potential model for more rapid and reliable dissemination of scholarly knowledge. The implications of such a concept would have a dramatic effect on the academic community. Originality/value - This paper promotes a radical idea for changing the methods by which academic knowledge is both constructed and disseminated.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 88
页数:16
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Publishing scientific journals online [J].
Abate, T .
BIOSCIENCE, 1997, 47 (03) :175-179
[2]  
ACHTERMAN D, 2005, KNOWLEDGE QUEST, V33, P38
[3]  
AHRENS F, 2006, WASHINGTON POST 0907
[4]  
ALEXA, 2007, TRAFFIC RANKING
[5]  
ANG CS, 2005, 9 EUR C COMP SUPP CO, P18
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, P SIGCHI C HUMAN FAC, DOI DOI 10.1145/985692.985765
[7]  
[Anonymous], SIGDOC 2004
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005 AM SOC ENG ED A
[9]   Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation [J].
Armstrong J.S. .
Science and Engineering Ethics, 1997, 3 (1) :63-84
[10]  
*ASS RES LIB, 2005, MON SER COSTS ARL LI