Severity scoring in the ICU: a review

被引:116
作者
Strand, K. [1 ]
Flaatten, H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Fac Med, Dept Surg Sci, Bergen, Norway
关键词
intensive care; case mix; multiple-organ failure; APACHE; prognosis; risk assessment; severity of illness index;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01586.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) require huge resources because of the dysfunction of several of their vital organs. The heterogeneity and complexity of the ICU patient have generated interest in systems able to measure severity of illness as a method of predicting outcome, comparing quality-of-care and stratification for clinical trials. Methods: By searching Medline and EMBASE for publications describing scoring systems in the ICU, the most frequently used systems, defined as resulting in more than 50 references, are included in this review. Scoring systems belong to one of four classes prognostic, single-organ failure, trauma scores and organ dysfunction (OD). The different systems are described and discussed. Results: Three different prognostic scoring systems, including several versions, four single OD scores and three OD scores, were included in this review. Conclusion: Different forms of scoring systems are frequently used in the ICU. They have become a necessary tool to describe ICU populations and to explain differences in mortality. As there are several pitfalls related to the interpretation of the numbers supplied by the systems, they should not be used without knowledge on the science of severity scoring.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 478
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   SAPS II revisited [J].
Aegerter, P ;
Boumendil, A ;
Retbi, A ;
Minvielle, E ;
Dervaux, B ;
Guidet, B .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (03) :416-423
[2]   Development of renal failure during the initial 24 h of intensive care unit stay correlates with hospital mortality in trauma patients [J].
Ala-Kokko, T. ;
Ohtonen, P. ;
Laurila, J. ;
Martikainen, M. ;
Kaukoranta, P. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 50 (07) :828-832
[3]   The performance of SAPS II in a cohort of patients admitted to 99 Italian ICUs: Results from GiViTl [J].
Apolone, G ;
Bertolini, G ;
DAmico, R ;
Iapichino, G ;
Cattaneo, A ;
DeSalvo, G ;
Melotti, RM .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (12) :1368-1378
[4]   Reliability and accuracy of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring [J].
Arts, DGT ;
de Keizer, NF ;
Vroom, MB ;
de Jonge, E .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (09) :1988-1993
[5]   Application of the APACHE III prognostic system in Brazilian intensive care units: A prospective multicenter study [J].
Bastos, PG ;
Sun, X ;
Wagner, DP ;
Knaus, WA ;
Zimmerman, JE ;
Gomes, DR ;
Coelho, CD ;
deSouza, PCSP ;
Lima, R ;
Passos, JT ;
Livianu, J ;
Dias, MD ;
Terzi, RGG ;
Rocha, M ;
Vieira, SRR .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (06) :564-570
[6]   External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study [J].
Beck, DH ;
Smith, GB ;
Pappachan, JV ;
Millar, B .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (02) :249-256
[7]   Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group [J].
Bellomo, R ;
Ronco, C ;
Kellum, JA ;
Mehta, RL ;
Palevsky, P .
CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (04) :R204-R212
[8]   The use of intensive care information systems alters outcome prediction [J].
Bosman, RJ ;
van Straaten, HMO ;
Zandstra, DF .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (09) :953-958
[9]  
BOYD O, 1994, CRIT CARE MED, V22, P1706
[10]   Validation of severity scoring systems SAPS II and APACHE II in a single-center population [J].
Capuzzo, M ;
Valpondi, V ;
Sgarbi, A ;
Bortolazzi, S ;
Pavoni, V ;
Gilli, G ;
Candini, G ;
Gritti, G ;
Alvisi, R .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 26 (12) :1779-1785