Post-operative outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer: a comparison of operative approach

被引:2
作者
Guidolin, Keegan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ng, Deanna [4 ]
Chadi, Sami [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Quereshy, Fayez A. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Biomed Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2022年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
Locally advanced colon cancer; Colon cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; SHORT-TERM; LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CONVERSION; METAANALYSIS; RESECTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08772-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Surgeons may choose an open approach to locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) because of the elevated conversion rate (minimally invasive to open) in these patients (resulting in part from a judgment of the technical feasibility of a minimally invasive approach). Poorer outcomes have been suggested in those requiring conversion from a minimal access to an open approach; however, the influence of conversion has not been studied in LACC. We sought to compare perioperative outcomes in patients with T4aN2 colon cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS), planned open (PO), and converted (CN) procedures to evaluate the influence of conversion in this subgroup. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the NSQIP database. Patients with T4aN2 colon cancer undergoing elective resection were included; rectal/unknown tumor location, and T4b disease were excluded (to ensure homogeneity in surgical management). Patients were divided into cohorts based on approach: PO, MIS, and CN. Summary statistics were compared between groups. Multivariable analysis was conducted for mortality and morbidity outcomes. Results 1286 cases were included (313 PO, 842 MIS, 131 CN); 10.2% underwent conversion. Those undergoing MIS had a shorter length of stay than those undergoing PO or CN (p < 0.0001). On univariable analysis, CN resulted in increased rates of any complication (p < 0.0001). CN also had a greater rate of anastomotic leak (p = 0.0046) and death (p = 0.05). On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of any complication included age, ASA class, M stage, and approach; however, CN did not increase the risk of complication compared with MIS, whereas PO nearly doubled the risk of complication (OR = 1.98, p = 0.0083). The only significant predictor of mortality on multivariable analysis was age (HR = 1.09, p = 0.0002)-approach was not associated with mortality. Conclusion PO confers the greatest risk of suffering any complication. Surgical approach was not associated with death. Results of our study challenge the notion that conversion is associated with the worst perioperative outcomes and an MIS approach should be considered in patients with LACC.
引用
收藏
页码:4580 / 4587
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Does conversion affect short-term and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopy for colorectal cancer? [J].
Allaix, Marco Ettore ;
Degiuli, Maurizio ;
Arezzo, Alberto ;
Arolfo, Simone ;
Morino, Mario .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (12) :4596-4607
[2]   Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level? [J].
Babberich, Michael P. M. de Neree Tot ;
van Groningen, Julia T. ;
Dekker, Evelien ;
Wiggers, Theo ;
Wouters, Michel W. J. M. ;
Bemelman, Willem A. ;
Tanis, Pieter J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (07) :3234-3246
[3]   Converted laparoscopic colectomy - What are the consequences? [J].
Belizon, A ;
Sardinha, CT ;
Sher, ME .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (06) :947-951
[4]   Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? [J].
Casillas, S ;
Delaney, CP ;
Senagore, AJ ;
Brady, K ;
Fazio, VW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (10) :1680-1685
[5]   A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery [J].
Clancy, C. ;
O'Leary, D. P. ;
Burke, J. P. ;
Redmond, H. P. ;
Coffey, J. C. ;
Kerin, M. J. ;
Myers, E. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (06) :482-490
[6]   The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J].
Cleary, Robert K. ;
Mullard, Andrew J. ;
Ferraro, Jane ;
Regenbogen, Scott E. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (03) :1515-1524
[7]   Correlation Between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Colon Cancer: Implications for Neoadjuvant Treatment [J].
Dehal, Ahmed N. ;
Graff-Baker, Amanda N. ;
Vuong, Brooke ;
Nelson, Daniel ;
Chang, Shu-Ching ;
Lee, David Y. ;
Goldfarb, Melanie ;
Bilchik, Anton J. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (10) :1764-1771
[8]   Oncologic Outcomes Following Laparoscopic versus Open Resection of pT4 Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Feinberg, Adina E. ;
Chesney, Tyler R. ;
Acuna, Sergio A. ;
Sammour, Tarik ;
Quereshy, Fayez A. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (01) :116-125
[9]   Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes [J].
Giglio, Mariano Cesare ;
Celentano, Valerio ;
Tarquini, Rachele ;
Luglio, Gaetano ;
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico ;
Bucci, Luigi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (11) :1445-1455
[10]   Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches Are Safe and Appropriate in N2 Colorectal Cancer [J].
Guidolin, Keegan ;
Spence, Richard T. ;
Chadi, Sami A. ;
Quereshy, Fayez A. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (03) :293-300