Four disputes about properties

被引:59
作者
Armstrong, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Philosophy, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Great Degree; Property Universal; Property Attribute; Predication Contingent; Controversial Decision;
D O I
10.1007/s11229-005-5852-7
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
In considering the nature of properties four controversial decisions must be made. (1) Are properties universals or tropes? (2) Are properties attributes of particulars, or are particulars just bundles of properties? (3) Are properties categorical (qualitative) in nature, or are they powers? (4) If a property attaches to a particular, is this predication contingent, or is it necessary? These choices seem to be in a great degree independent of each other. The author indicates his own choices.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 320
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ONTOLOGICAL POINT VI, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199259747.001.0001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, POWERS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Ontology
[4]  
Armstrong, 1983, WHAT IS LAW NATURE
[5]  
Armstrong D.M., 1999, PHILOS TOPICS, V26, P25
[6]  
Armstrong David, 1996, Dispositions: A Debate
[7]  
ARMSTRONG DM, IN PRESS PARTICULARS
[8]  
Armstrong DM, 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS
[9]  
Baxter DLM, 2001, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V79, P449
[10]  
DRETSKE F, 1997, PHILOS SCI, V44, P248