Rapid Full-Cycle Technique to Control Adulteration of Meat Products: Integration of Accelerated Sample Preparation, Recombinase Polymerase Amplification, and Test-Strip Detection

被引:13
作者
Ivanov, Aleksandr V. [1 ]
Popravko, Demid S. [1 ]
Safenkova, Irina V. [1 ]
Zvereva, Elena A. [1 ]
Dzantiev, Boris B. [1 ]
Zherdev, Anatoly V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, AN Bach Inst Biochem, Biotechnol Res Ctr, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow 119071, Russia
来源
MOLECULES | 2021年 / 26卷 / 22期
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
meat adulteration; chicken additives; pig additives; cytochrome B; recombinase polymerase amplification; lateral flow assay; rapid test; LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY; FOOD FRAUD; PCR DETECTION; IDENTIFICATION; AUTHENTICATION; PORK; ORIGIN; RISKS; BEEF; SIZE;
D O I
10.3390/molecules26226804
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Verifying the authenticity of food products is essential due to the recent increase in counterfeit meat-containing food products. The existing methods of detection have a number of disadvantages. Therefore, simple, cheap, and sensitive methods for detecting various types of meat are required. In this study, we propose a rapid full-cycle technique to control the chicken or pig adulteration of meat products, including 3 min of crude DNA extraction, 20 min of recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) at 39 & DEG;C, and 10 min of lateral flow assay (LFA) detection. The cytochrome B gene was used in the developed RPA-based test for chicken and pig identification. The selected primers provided specific RPA without DNA nuclease and an additional oligonucleotide probe. As a result, RPA-LFA, based on designed fluorescein- and biotin-labeled primers, detected up to 0.2 pg total DNA per mu L, which provided up to 0.001% w/w identification of the target meat component in the composite meat. The RPA-LFA of the chicken and pig meat identification was successfully applied to processed meat products and to meat after heating. The results were confirmed by real-time PCR. Ultimately, the developed analysis is specific and enables the detection of pork and chicken impurities with high accuracy in raw and processed meat mixtures. The proposed rapid full-cycle technique could be adopted for the authentication of other meat products.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Specific PCR method for detection of species origin in biochemical drugs via primers for the ATPase 8 gene by electrophoresis
    Ai, Limei
    Liu, Juanjuan
    Jiang, Yu
    Guo, Weiwei
    Wei, Ping
    Bai, Liping
    [J]. MICROCHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 186 (09)
  • [2] Multiplex PCR in Species Authentication: Probability and Prospects-A Review
    Ali, Md. Eaqub
    Razzak, Md. Abdur
    Abd Hamid, Sharifah Bee
    [J]. FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2014, 7 (10) : 1933 - 1949
  • [3] Authentication of a traditional game meat sausage (Alheira) by species-specific PCR assays to detect hare, rabbit, red deer, pork and cow meats
    Amaral, Joana S.
    Santos, Cristina G.
    Melo, Vitor S.
    Oliveira, M. Beatriz P. P.
    Mafra, Isabel
    [J]. FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 60 : 140 - 145
  • [4] Authenticity of meat products: Tools against fraud
    Angel Sentandreu, Miguel
    Sentandreu, Enrique
    [J]. FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 60 : 19 - 29
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, R317192012 GOST
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2013, 554552013 GOST
  • [7] Determination of food authenticity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
    Asensio, Luis
    Gonzalez, Isabel
    Garcia, Teresa
    Martin, Rosario
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2008, 19 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [8] Application of 16s rDNA and cytochrome b ribosomal markers in studies of lineage and fish populations structure of aquatic species
    Baharum, Syarul Nataqain
    Nurdalila, A'wani Aziz
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 39 (05) : 5225 - 5232
  • [9] Authentication of meat and meat products
    Ballin, N. Z.
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2010, 86 (03) : 577 - 587
  • [10] Food adulteration: Sources, health risks, and detection methods
    Bansal, Sangita
    Singh, Apoorva
    Mangal, Manisha
    Mangal, Anupam K.
    Kumar, Sanjiv
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2017, 57 (06) : 1174 - 1189