Prepectoral Conversion of Subpectoral Implants for Animation Deformity after Breast Reconstruction: Technique and Experience

被引:2
|
作者
Shikhman, Alexander [1 ]
Erz, Logan [2 ]
Brown, Meghan [1 ]
Wagner, Douglas [1 ]
机构
[1] Summa Hlth Syst, Div Plast Surg, Dept Surg, Akron, OH 44309 USA
[2] Summa Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Akron, OH 44309 USA
关键词
PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000004132
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction in postmastectomy patients is commonly performed in a submuscular plane. Following reconstruction, animation deformity can be a displeasing aesthetic result for patients. In addition, patients may experience more postoperative pain with a submuscular reconstruction. Prepectoral conversion of submuscular implant position is an option for addressing these concerns. We describe a detailed technique and review our results. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all prepectoral conversions performed by the senior author (DSW) from 2017 to 2019 after IRB approval. All patients presented with animation deformity and another symptom such as asymmetry, pain, and/or capsular contracture. Patients underwent prepectoral conversion with smooth silicone gel implants. Demographic data, outcomes, and patient satisfaction were reviewed. Results: Prepectoral conversion was performed in 33 consecutive patients (57 breasts) with animation deformity. Twelve patients had capsular contracture, seven complained of pain, and five had ruptured implants. Postoperative complications included three infections requiring implant removal in two breasts, one implant exposure and one hematoma requiring implant replacement, five seromas requiring aspiration, and one capsular contracture. Seven patients had contour abnormalities addressed with secondary autologous fat grafting. Ultimately, all patients had elimination of animation deformity and were satisfied with the results of the conversion. Conclusions: Unsatisfactory results of subpectoral implant reconstruction such as animation deformity and chronic pain have led the reconstructive surgeon to consider various techniques to address these issues. The conversion to a prepectoral plane will effectively eliminate animation deformity, resolve pain, and yield satisfactory results in these patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy, from the Subpectoral to the Prepectoral Approach: An Evidence-Based Change of Mind?
    Weinzierl, Andrea
    Schmauss, Daniel
    Brucato, Davide
    Harder, Yves
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [22] A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, Jeong-Hoon
    Hong, Seung Eun
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (10): : 1 - 10
  • [23] Evaluation of capsular contracture following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
    Sobti, Nikhil
    Weitzman, Rachel E.
    Nealon, Kassandra P.
    Jimenez, Rachel B.
    Gfrerer, Lisa
    Mattos, David
    Ehrlichman, Richard J.
    Gadd, Michele
    Specht, Michelle
    Austen, William G.
    Liao, Eric C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [24] Complications After Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xue
    Ning, Shuhua
    Zhang, Yankun
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (21) : 4421 - 4429
  • [25] A Single-center Comparison of Surgical Outcomes following Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Villanueva, Karie
    Patel, Harsh
    Ghosh, Durga
    Klomhaus, Alexandra
    Slack, Ginger
    Festekjian, Jaco
    Da Lio, Andrew
    Tseng, Charles
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (06)
  • [26] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient’s Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q
    Annalisa Cogliandro
    Rosa Salzillo
    Riccardo De Bernardis
    Francesco Saverio Loria
    Valeria Petrucci
    Mauro Barone
    Stefania Tenna
    Barbara Cagli
    Paolo Persichetti
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 1291 - 1299
  • [27] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q
    Cogliandro, Annalisa
    Salzillo, Rosa
    De Bernardis, Riccardo
    Loria, Francesco Saverio
    Petrucci, Valeria
    Barone, Mauro
    Tenna, Stefania
    Cagli, Barbara
    Persichetti, Paolo
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (04) : 1291 - 1299
  • [28] Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction A Comparison Between Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Implant Placement
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    Kapoor, Trishul
    Banuelos, Joseph
    Jacobson, Steven R.
    Martinez-Jorge, Jorys
    Nguyen, Minh-Doan T.
    Tran, Nho V.
    Harless, Christin A.
    Degnim, Amy C.
    Jakub, James W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (04) : 361 - 365
  • [29] Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement
    Wormer, Blair A.
    Valmadrid, Al C.
    Kumar, Nishant Ganesh
    Al Kassis, Salam
    Rankin, Timothy M.
    Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos
    Higdon, Kent K.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (02) : 276 - 286
  • [30] Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastopexy Utilizing an Inferiorly Based Adipodermal Flap: Our Experience with Prepectoral and Subpectoral Techniques
    Mosharrafa, Ali M.
    Mosharrafa, Tamir M.
    Zannis, Victor J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (05) : 1125 - 1133