Development, Testing, and Implementation of the Belgian Patient Reported Experience Measure for Pancreatic Cancer Care (PREPARE) Project: Protocol for a Multi-Method Research Project

被引:2
作者
Moens, Katrien [1 ]
Peeters, Marc [2 ]
Van den Bulcke, Marc [1 ]
Leys, Mark [3 ]
Horlait, Melissa [3 ]
机构
[1] Sciensano, Ctr Canc, Rue Juliette Wytsmanstr 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Antwerp UZA, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussels, Policy & Social Inequal Healthcare Res Grp OPIH, Org, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
patient-centered care; quality of health care; interdisciplinary research; decision-making; pancreatic cancer; quality; outcome; assessment; cancer; pancreas; development; testing; implementation; patient-reported; experience; protocol; participatory medicine; MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM MEETINGS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; QUALITY; OUTPATIENTS; DISTRESS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; LUNG;
D O I
10.2196/29004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients with pancreatic cancer do not feel involved in the development of their treatment and care plans. In Belgium, these plans are decided on during multidisciplinary team meetings. However, limited time is spent on the discussion of the preferences of the patient during these meetings. This research project aims to develop a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for pancreatic cancer and assess if its use can support collaborative treatment decision-making. Objective: This paper aims to outline the protocol for a multi-method research project to improve person-centered pancreatic cancer care in Belgium. Three subobjectives are pursued: (1) to develop a PREM to assess the experiences of care-related aspects in pancreatic cancer care, (2) to validate the PREM, and (3) to develop and evaluate an educational intervention to support the use of the PREM's results. Methods: For the development of the PREM, an exploratory mixed methods study design will be used. The study will start with a survey followed by a telephone interview involving patients with pancreatic cancer and digestive oncology health care professionals. Study two is the testing of the content and construct validity of the PREM. Study three involves the implementation study according to the Medical Research Council framework of a complex intervention introducing the PREM in practice. The effectiveness of the intervention will be investigated using a pragmatic randomized controlled trial study design. Results: The protocol presents the entire structure of the research project. Ethics approval to conduct the exploratory mixed methods study (objective 1) has been obtained, and recruitment has started since January 2022. Conclusions: The poor prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer should not be considered a hurdle to not study this patient population group. Involving patients in the research and decision-making processes early on is key. This project aims to realize a scientifically sound research process providing research outputs that can easily and timely be implemented in the care trajectory of patients with pancreatic cancer. This research project will also lead to recommendations on how to involve patients with pancreatic cancer and how the methodology of this research project can be translated to other patient groups. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/29004
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study [J].
Mokkink, Lidwine B. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Patrick, Donald L. ;
Alonso, Jordi ;
Stratford, Paul W. ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Bouter, Lex M. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (04) :539-549
[22]   Examining the Role of Patient Experience Surveys in Measuring Health Care Quality [J].
Price, Rebecca Anhang ;
Elliott, Marc N. ;
Zaslavsky, Alan M. ;
Hays, Ron D. ;
Lehrman, William G. ;
Rybowski, Lise ;
Edgman-Levitan, Susan ;
Cleary, Paul D. .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2014, 71 (05) :522-554
[23]   Determinants of treatment plan implementation in multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a mixed-methods study [J].
Raine, Rosalind ;
Xanthopoulou, Penny ;
Wallace, Isla ;
Bhaird, Caoimhe Nic A' ;
Lanceley, Anne ;
Clarke, Alex ;
Livingston, Gill ;
Prentice, Archie ;
Ardron, Dave ;
Harris, Miriam ;
King, Michael ;
Michie, Susan ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Austin-Parsons, Natalie ;
Gibbs, Simon ;
Barber, Julie .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (10) :867-876
[24]   Cancer patient experience measures: An evidence review [J].
Saunders, Carla ;
Carter, David J. ;
Jordan, Amy ;
Duffield, Christine ;
Bichel-Findlay, Jen .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (03) :200-222
[25]  
Schreck S, 2017, RECOMMENDATIONS OECD
[26]  
Tabellen op jaarbasis, BELG CANC REG
[27]   Teams and Teamwork During a Cancer Diagnosis: Interdependency Within and Between Teams [J].
Taplin, Stephen H. ;
Weaver, Sallie ;
Chollette, Veronica ;
Marks, Lawrence B. ;
Jacobs, Andrew ;
Schiff, Gordon ;
Stricker, Carrie T. ;
Bruinooge, Suanna S. ;
Salas, Eduardo .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2015, 11 (03) :231-+
[28]   Determining the effectiveness of a clinical-practice intervention in improving the control of pain in outpatients with cancer [J].
Trowbridge, R ;
Dugan, W ;
Jay, SJ ;
Littrell, D ;
Casebeer, LL ;
Edgerton, S ;
Anderson, J ;
OToole, JB .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1997, 72 (09) :798-800
[29]  
Velikova Galina, 2004, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, V4, P403, DOI 10.1586/14737167.4.4.403
[30]   Patients report improvements in continuity of care when quality of life assessments are used routinely in oncology practice: Secondary outcomes of a randomised controlled trial [J].
Velikova, Galina ;
Keding, Ada ;
Harley, Clare ;
Cocks, Kim ;
Booth, Laura ;
Smith, Adam B. ;
Wright, Penny ;
Selby, Peter J. ;
Brown, Julia M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (13) :2381-2388