Preservation of replaced left hepatic artery during robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A case series

被引:4
作者
Hess, Nicholas R. [1 ]
Rizk, Nabil P. [2 ]
Luketich, James D. [3 ]
Sarkaria, Inderpal S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] John Theurer Canc Ctr, Div Thorac Surg, Hackensack, NJ USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
esophagectomy; minimally invasive; replaced left hepatic artery; Robotic; IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY; GASTRIC-CANCER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; OUTCOMES; ANATOMY; LIVER;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.1802
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Finding of a significant replaced left hepatic artery (RLHA) during esophagectomy is relatively rare, with an incidence of approximately 5%. Sparing of the artery may be required to avoid complications of liver ischemia. Robotic assistance during esophagectomy may provide a technically superior method of artery preservation with minimally invasive approaches. Methods This is a retrospective case series of patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) identified to have a significant RLHA at time of surgery. Results Five patients with a significant RLHA were identified from a series of over 100 RAMIE operations. Preservation of RLHA was accomplished in all cases without need for conversion, no intra-operative complications, and no post-operative liver dysfunction. The stomach was suitable and used for conduit reconstruction in all patients. Conclusions Sparing of the RLHA during RAMIE is feasible and effective. The robotic assisted approach may obviate the need for open conversion during these complex minimally invasive operations.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Ruptured aneurysm of replaced left hepatic artery as a cause of haemorrhagic shock: a challenge of diagnosis and treatment [J].
Altaca, Gulum .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 14 (02) :220-222
[2]   Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Flow Redistribution by Occlusion of Intrahepatic Vessels Prior to Radioembolization in the Treatment of Liver Tumors [J].
Bilbao, Jose I. ;
Garrastachu, Puy ;
Herraiz, Maria J. ;
Rodriguez, Macarena ;
Inarrairaegui, Mercedes ;
Rodriguez, Javier ;
Hernandez, Carmen ;
Martinez de la Cuesta, Antonio ;
Arbizu, Javier ;
Sangro, Bruno .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (03) :523-531
[3]  
Blot WJ, 1999, SEMIN ONCOL, V26, P2
[4]   Transhiatal robot-assisted esophagectomy [J].
Boone, J. ;
Rinkes, I. H. M. Borel ;
van Hillegersberg, R. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (04) :1139-1140
[5]   Oesophageal cancer incidence in the United States by race, sex, and histologic type, 1977-2005 [J].
Cook, M. B. ;
Chow, W-H ;
Devesa, S. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (05) :855-859
[6]   ESOPHAGOGASTRECTOMY AND THE VARIANT LEFT HEPATIC-ARTERY [J].
HEMMING, AW ;
FINLEY, RJ ;
EVANS, KG ;
NELEMS, B ;
FRADET, G .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1992, 54 (01) :166-168
[7]   SURGICAL ANATOMY OF THE HEPATIC ARTERIES IN 1000 CASES [J].
HIATT, JR ;
GABBAY, J ;
BUSUTTIL, RW .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (01) :50-52
[8]   Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality [J].
Hur, Chin ;
Miller, Melecia ;
Kong, Chung Yin ;
Dowling, Emily C. ;
Nattinger, Kevin J. ;
Dunn, Michelle ;
Feuer, Eric J. .
CANCER, 2013, 119 (06) :1149-1158
[9]   Anatomic variations of the hepatic arteries in 604 selective celiac and superior mesenteric angiographies [J].
Koops, A ;
Wojciechowski, B ;
Broering, DC ;
Adam, G ;
Krupski-Berdien, G .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2004, 26 (03) :239-244
[10]   Randomized Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy: Early Perioperative Outcomes Appear Improved With a Minimally Invasive Approach [J].
Levy, Ryan M. ;
Pennathur, Arjun ;
Luketich, James D. .
SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 24 (03) :153-154