Green together? The effects of companies' innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation

被引:75
作者
Kobarg, Sebastian [1 ]
Stumpf-Wollersheim, Jutta [2 ]
Schlagel, Christopher [3 ]
Welpe, Isabel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, Chair Strategy & Org, Arcisstr 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Bergakad Freiberg, Fak Wirtschaftswissensch, Int Management & Unternehmensstrategie, Freiberg, Germany
[3] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, Global Econ & Management Dept, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Ecological innovation; process ecological innovation; product ecological innovation; collaboration; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECO-INNOVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION; SECTORAL PATTERNS; KNOWLEDGE; DETERMINANTS; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1080/13662716.2020.1713733
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the effect of companies' innovation collaboration with different partner types on the emergence of different typologies of ecological innovation (EI), specifically process- and product-EI. Econometric analyses, based on a sample of 546 German manufacturing companies collected as part of the Community Innovation Survey, indicate a differential effect of collaboration with individual partner types. Specifically, we find that collaboration with consumers is associated positively with both process- and product-EI, whereas collaboration with universities and suppliers is associated positively only with process-EI. Collaboration with enterprise customers and competitors is neither associated with process-EI nor product-EI. Our results shed light on the mechanisms within the recently established open eco-innovation mode and emphasise the importance for theory and practice of distinguishing among collaboration partners, contingent on the underlying typology of EI. We discuss important implications for theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 990
页数:38
相关论文
共 100 条
[91]   Who co-operates for innovation, and why - An empirical analysis [J].
Tether, BS .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (06) :947-967
[92]  
THEYEL G., 2006, Greening the Supply Chain, P139, DOI [10.1007/1-84628-299-38, DOI 10.1007/1-84628-299-38, DOI 10.1007/1-84628-299-3_8]
[93]   Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? [J].
Toedtling, Franz ;
Lehner, Patrick ;
Kaufmann, Alexander .
TECHNOVATION, 2009, 29 (01) :59-71
[94]   Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs [J].
Triguero, Angela ;
Moreno-Mondejar, Lourdes ;
Davia, Maria A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 92 :25-33
[95]   LEAD USER ANALYSES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW INDUSTRIAL-PRODUCTS [J].
URBAN, GL ;
VONHIPPEL, E .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1988, 34 (05) :569-582
[96]   R&D Cooperation, Partner Diversity, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Analysis [J].
van Beers, Cees ;
Zand, Fardad .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (02) :292-312
[97]   STICKY INFORMATION AND THE LOCUS OF PROBLEM-SOLVING - IMPLICATIONS FOR INNOVATION [J].
VONHIPPEL, E .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 40 (04) :429-439
[98]   LIKELIHOOD RATIO TESTS FOR MODEL SELECTION AND NON-NESTED HYPOTHESES [J].
VUONG, QH .
ECONOMETRICA, 1989, 57 (02) :307-333
[99]   Network resource stocks and flows: how do alliance portfolios affect the value of new alliance formations? [J].
Wassmer, Ulrich ;
Dussauge, Pierre .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (07) :871-883
[100]   A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM [J].
WERNERFELT, B .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1984, 5 (02) :171-180