Green together? The effects of companies' innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation

被引:72
作者
Kobarg, Sebastian [1 ]
Stumpf-Wollersheim, Jutta [2 ]
Schlagel, Christopher [3 ]
Welpe, Isabel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, Chair Strategy & Org, Arcisstr 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Bergakad Freiberg, Fak Wirtschaftswissensch, Int Management & Unternehmensstrategie, Freiberg, Germany
[3] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, Global Econ & Management Dept, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Ecological innovation; process ecological innovation; product ecological innovation; collaboration; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECO-INNOVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION; SECTORAL PATTERNS; KNOWLEDGE; DETERMINANTS; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1080/13662716.2020.1713733
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the effect of companies' innovation collaboration with different partner types on the emergence of different typologies of ecological innovation (EI), specifically process- and product-EI. Econometric analyses, based on a sample of 546 German manufacturing companies collected as part of the Community Innovation Survey, indicate a differential effect of collaboration with individual partner types. Specifically, we find that collaboration with consumers is associated positively with both process- and product-EI, whereas collaboration with universities and suppliers is associated positively only with process-EI. Collaboration with enterprise customers and competitors is neither associated with process-EI nor product-EI. Our results shed light on the mechanisms within the recently established open eco-innovation mode and emphasise the importance for theory and practice of distinguishing among collaboration partners, contingent on the underlying typology of EI. We discuss important implications for theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 990
页数:38
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation [J].
Adner, R ;
Levinthal, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (05) :611-628
[2]   Environmental Strategies and Green Product Development: an Overview on Sustainability-Driven Companies [J].
Albino, Vito ;
Balice, Azzurra ;
Dangelico, Rosa Maria .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 18 (02) :83-96
[3]   Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation [J].
Albort-Morant, Gema ;
Henseler, Jorg ;
Leal-Millan, Antonio ;
Cepeda-Carrion, Gabriel .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (06)
[4]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[5]  
Andersen M. M., 2009, DRUID SUMM C 2009 CO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, OSL MAN PROP GUID CO, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264013100-EN
[7]   Organizational learning research: Past, present and future [J].
Argote, Linda .
MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2011, 42 (04) :439-446
[8]   Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation-Happy Together? [J].
Aschhoff, Birgit ;
Schmidt, Tobias .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2008, 33 (01) :41-62
[9]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[10]   Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations [J].
Beise, M ;
Rennings, K .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 52 (01) :5-17