Is individual practice in an immersive and interactive virtual reality application non-inferior to practicing with traditional equipment in learning systematic clinical observation? A randomized controlled trial

被引:39
作者
Berg, Helen [1 ]
Steinsbekk, Aslak [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Virtual reality; ABCDE approach; Individual self-practice; Simulation; Clinical skills; Immersive; Interactive virtual reality; Interactive; SIMULATION; SKILLS; STUDENTS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-020-02030-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to investigate if individual self-practice of the ABCDE approach (Airways, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure) in an immersive and interactive virtual reality (VR) application gave non-inferior learning outcome compared to using traditional equipment (TP) in first year medical and nursing students. Methods A non-inferior parallel group randomized controlled trial. The study was linked to a regular teaching program conducted in August and September 2019. All students participated in a 15-min ABCDE introduction session, before they self-practiced the ABCDE approach for 20 min in either a fully immersive and interactive VR application using hand controllers with some haptic feedback (Individual VR) or with blood pressure gauge, ear-thermometer and oximeter (Individual TP). The primary outcome was the number of students who documented all the eight predefined observations in the ABCDE approach in the correct order in a practical test on an advanced simulator manikin with a time limit of 5 min, done immediately after the self-practice. The predefined one-sided non-inferiority limit was 13% points. Results Of all eligible students, 84% participated in the study and randomly allocated to VR (n = 149) or TP (n = 140). The primary outcome showed non-inferiority of the VR application with 24.8% in individual VR doing all observations in correct order compared to 27.1% TP (absolute difference 2.3% points, one sided 95% CI 2.3 to 10.8). The secondary outcomes were similar between the groups, but more students in VR reported liking the way they practiced (absolute difference 46% points, 95% CI 36.5 to 56.6) and that it was a good way to learn (36.9% points, 95% CI 26.8 to 47). VR also scored high on the System Usability Scale (mean difference 6.4% points, 95% CI 2.8-10.1). Conclusions Individual self-practicing the ABCDE approach in VR was non-inferior to individual self-practicing with traditional equipment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Simulation-based medical education in clinical skills laboratory [J].
Akaike, Masashi ;
Fukutomi, Miki ;
Nagamune, Masami ;
Fujimoto, Akiko ;
Tsuji, Akiko ;
Ishida, Kazuko ;
Iwata, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION, 2012, 59 (1-2) :28-35
[2]  
Andersen SAW, 2016, DAN MED J, V63
[3]  
Brook J, 1996, Usability Evaluation in Industry, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9781498710411, DOI 10.1201/9781498710411-35]
[4]   Exploring Virtual Worlds for Scenario-Based Repeated Team Training of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Medical Students [J].
Creutzfeldt, Johan ;
Hedman, Leif ;
Medin, Christopher ;
Heinrichs, Wm LeRoy ;
Fellander-Tsai, Li .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (03) :e38
[5]   A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes [J].
Curran, Vernon ;
Fleet, Lisa ;
White, Susan ;
Bessell, Clare ;
Deshpandey, Akhil ;
Drover, Anne ;
Hayward, Mark ;
Valcour, James .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 20 (01) :205-218
[6]   Preparing Residents Effectively in Emergency Skills Training With a Serious Game [J].
Dankbaar, Mary E. W. ;
Roozeboom, Maartje Bakhuys ;
Oprins, Esther A. P. B. ;
Rutten, Frans ;
van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. ;
van Saase, Jan L. C. M. ;
Schuit, Stephanie C. E. .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2017, 12 (01) :9-16
[7]   An experimental study on the effects of a simulation game on students' clinical cognitive skills and motivation [J].
Dankbaar, Mary E. W. ;
Alsma, Jelmer ;
Jansen, Els E. H. ;
van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. ;
van Saase, Jan L. C. M. ;
Schuit, Stephanie C. E. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 21 (03) :505-521
[8]   The Student Experience With Varying Immersion Levels of Virtual Reality Simulation [J].
Farra, Sharon L. ;
Smith, Sherrill J. ;
Ulrich, Deborah L. .
NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 39 (02) :99-101
[9]   Virtual reality simulator versus box-trainer to teach minimally invasive procedures: A meta-analysis [J].
Guedes, Hugo Goncalo ;
Camara Costa Ferreira, Zemia Maria ;
de Sousa Leao, Layra Ribeiro ;
Souza Montero, Edna Frasson ;
Otoch, Jose Pinhata ;
de Almeida Artifon, Everson Luiz .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 61 :60-68
[10]   Simulation-based training for nurses: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Hegland, Pal A. ;
Aarlie, Hege ;
Stromme, Hilde ;
Jamtvedt, Gro .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 54 :6-20