Social entrepreneurship performance measurement: A time-based organizing framework

被引:21
|
作者
Arogyaswamy, Bernard [1 ]
机构
[1] Le Moyne Coll, Madden Sch Business, 1419 Salt Springs Rd, Syracuse, NY 13214 USA
关键词
Social entrepreneurship; Social enterprise; Social responsibility of business; Conceptual framework; Performance measurement; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Social entrepreneurship (SE) has evolved from an initial period of explosive growth (SE 1.0), during which research focused on organizational and founder characteristics, to a stage that witnessed the rise of institutions facilitating SE formation and growth (SE 2.0). At present, while expansion in the number and scope of social enterprises continues, there is also a concerted effort underway to ascertain whether social enterprises are performing as expected (SE 3.0). A framework to assess the performance of SE, building on the type of metrics employed by business firms, is presented in this article. The framework consisting of action-resources, predictors, outputs, outcomes, and impact is intended to measure achievement along a timeline. Examples of how the framework would be used are provided for social enterprises with a range of social purposes, including one that involves an existing enterprise with the mission of reducing recidivism among incarcerated women. Brief comparisons with measures actually used help identify how the time-based approach laid out here would enhance assessment efforts and even serve as a basis for planning and decision making. The proposed framework could serve as a template to assess all social enterprises regardless of purpose, stakeholder mix, or scale of operations. (C) 2017 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 611
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Time Scorecard: An integrative Performance Measurement Framework For Time-based Companies
    Cui Song
    Zhang Hong
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 9605 - 9609
  • [2] Angels on the head of a pin The SAC framework for performance measurement in social entrepreneurship ventures
    Lane, Michelle
    Casile, Maureen
    SOCIAL ENTERPRISE JOURNAL, 2011, 7 (03) : 238 - +
  • [3] Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework
    Kamaludin, Mohammed Faiz
    Xavier, Jesrina Ann
    Amin, Muslim
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2024, 15 (01) : 26 - 49
  • [4] Social entrepreneurship in tourism: A framework-based scoping review and research agenda
    Aquino, Richard S.
    Boluk, Karla A.
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2025, 57
  • [5] Social Entrepreneurship: Setting Boundaries for aConceptual Framework
    Hu, Xiaoti
    Frank, Regina
    Cohen, Laurie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, VOL 1 AND 2, 2011, : 466 - 475
  • [6] Appalachian social entrepreneurship ecosystem: A framework for rural development
    Ricket, Allison L.
    Knutsen, Faith Beale
    Jolley, G. Jason
    Davis, Sarah C.
    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 54 (03) : 315 - 336
  • [7] A conceptual framework of tourism social entrepreneurship for sustainable community development
    Aquino, Richard S.
    Luck, Michael
    Schanzel, Heike A.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 37 : 23 - 32
  • [8] The Evolution of Social Entrepreneurship: Broadening the Framework for the Digital and Sustainable Era
    Perez-Barea, Jose Javier
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2025, 15 (02)
  • [9] Social Impact Measurement: Current Approaches and Future Directions for Social Entrepreneurship Research
    Rawhouser, Hans
    Cummings, Michael
    Newbert, Scott L.
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 43 (01) : 82 - 115
  • [10] Alternative relationships among integrative beliefs, time-based manufacturing and performance
    Narasimhan, Ram
    Kull, Thomas J.
    Nahm, Abraham
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (3-4) : 496 - 524