Allocation of emission permits using DEA-game-theoretic model

被引:27
作者
Sun, Jiasen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fu, Yelin [4 ]
Ji, Xiang [5 ]
Zhong, Ray Y. [6 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Business Sch, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Soochow Think Tank, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Soochow Univ, Res Ctr Smarter Supply Chain, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Auckland, Dept Mech Engn, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Allocation of emission permits (AEP); Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Game theory; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; FIXED COST; EFFICIENCY; ABATEMENT; SCHEMES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s12351-016-0289-y
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper discusses schemes for allocation of emission permits (AEP) among a group of manufacturing companies, aiming at controlling the total emissions of the group while maintaining efficient production. Game theory and data envelopment analysis have been integrated in different ways for constructing two variants of AEP models. The first situation is where all members in the group are cooperative and a reasonable permit allocation scheme maximizes the overall payoff of the group. The second situation is where group members are non-cooperative and each member makes every effort to selfishly maximize its own payoff. The decision maker allocates permits to firms according to their non-cooperative game equilibrium scores. Proposed models are applied to study a group of paper mills to analyze their payoffs. The results show that the methods proposed in this work can provide reasonable allocation results for all firms. In addition, although our allocation methods adopt the principle of maximizing the payoff of the firm, the efficiency of each firm from current output and input levels is still a factor that determines the permit allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 884
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ACKERMAN F, 1997, ELECT J, V10, P61, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1040-6190(97)80472-1
[2]  
Adams J, 2010, ALLOCATING EMISSIONS
[3]   A Ten-Year Rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances [J].
Ahman, Markus ;
Burtraw, Dallas ;
Kruger, Joseph ;
Zetterberg, Lars .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) :1718-1730
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 0130 RES FUT
[5]   Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel systems [J].
Athanassopoulos, AD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (02) :173-187
[6]   MALMQUIST INDEXES OF PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH DURING THE DEREGULATION OF NORWEGIAN BANKING, 1980-89 [J].
BERG, SA ;
FORSUND, FR ;
JANSEN, ES .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1992, 94 :S211-S228
[7]   On the design of optimal grandfathering schemes for emission allowances [J].
Böhringer, C ;
Lange, A .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 49 (08) :2041-2055
[8]   Transactions costs in tradable permit markets: An experimental study of pollution market designs [J].
Cason, TN ;
Gangadharan, L .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2003, 23 (02) :145-165
[9]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[10]   Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Poon, Gary Ka Kwai ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2009, 48 (01) :246-256