Supporting Case-Based Reasoning in Pharmacy Through Case Sequencing

被引:2
作者
Tawfik, Andrew A. [1 ]
Fowlin, Julaine [2 ]
Kelley, Kristi [3 ]
Anderson, Max [4 ]
Vann, Scott W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Dept Instruct Design & Technol, 3798 Walker Ave,Ball Hall Off 421D, Memphis, TN 38111 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Harrison Sch Pharm, Dept Teaching Learning & Assessment, 2316 Walker Bldg, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[3] Auburn Univ, Harrison Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, 1323 Walker Bldg, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, 1853 W Polk St, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[5] Univ Memphis, UofM Global, 215 W Poplar Ave, Memphis, TN 38017 USA
关键词
Problem-based learning; Case-based reasoning; Formative assessment; Health professions education; Pharmacy education; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; CRITICAL THINKING; ONLINE; IMPLEMENTATION; SPACE;
D O I
10.1007/s41686-019-00035-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Pharmacists are often required to solve ill-structured problems aimed at achieving optimal health outcomes at the patient, population, and institutional levels. Given the complexity of pharmacists' clinical decisions, educators are exploring ways to foster complex problem-solving and higher order thinking in the classroom. One emerging strategy includes problem-based learning (PBL), which asks learners to collaboratively solve ill-structured cases that are representative of the types of problems faced by practitioners. Case-based reasoning argues that understanding and interpretation of a case is incremental and dynamic; that is, the lessons learned from one case might change in view of new experiences and across a case-based curriculum. While much of the literature is focused on how learners solve a single problem, it is unclear how learners construct their knowledge across multiple cases presented in PBL. To address this gap, this study focused on learners' perception of case sequencing and how that design influenced the development of their internal case library. Because we are focused on formative assessment, we used qualitative analysis to understand the nuances of our design and explored its implications for programmatic changes. The feedback from the participants focused on index generation, index prioritization, alignment with prior knowledge, and reflection. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 122
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Abrami, Philip C. ;
Bernard, Robert M. ;
Borokhovski, Eugene ;
Waddington, David I. ;
Wade, C. Anne ;
Persson, Tonje .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 85 (02) :275-314
[2]  
Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), 2015, STAND 2016
[3]  
Albanese M.A., 2014, J EXCELLENCE COLL TE, V25, P239
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ARTIFICIAL INTELL CO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Complexity, DOI [DOI 10.1002/CPLX.1027, 10.1002/cplx.1027]
[6]   A TAXONOMY OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING-METHODS [J].
BARROWS, HS .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1986, 20 (06) :481-486
[7]  
Barrows HS, 1980, PROBLEM BASED LEARNI
[8]  
Baxter P, 2008, QUAL REP, V13, P544
[9]   An Elective Course on Application of Clinical Pharmacy Principles [J].
Brady, Jessica H. ;
Caldwell, David J. ;
Pate, Kristen A. ;
Pate, Adam N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 77 (10)
[10]   Facilitation strategies and problem space coverage: comparing face-to-face and online case-based discussions [J].
Ertmer, Peggy A. ;
Koehler, Adrie A. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 66 (03) :639-670