Measurement-related uncertainties in overcoring data at the Aspo HRL, Sweden. Part 2: Biaxial tests of CSIRO HI overcore samples

被引:22
作者
Ask, D
机构
[1] SwedPower Co, SE-97177 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Royal Inst Technol, Div Engn Geol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Lulea Univ Technol, Div Rock Mech, S-95187 Lulea, Sweden
关键词
overcoring; biaxial test; CSIRO HI; Aspo HRL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.05.012
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper is the second dealing with measurement-related uncertainties of overcoring data undertaken at the Aspo Hard Rock Laboratory and focuses on the biaxial test data from CSIRO HI overcore samples. The first paper dealt with measurement-related uncertainties in connection with the overcoring phase [1]. The uncertainties identified in connection to biaxial tests of CSIRO HI overcore samples include too large applied pressures and poor sampling frequency. At the Aspo HRL, the results yield that most overcore samples fractured during biaxial testing, meaning that a significant part, 56%, of available strain gauge combinations were removed from calculations of the elastic parameters. Remaining strain gauge combinations indicate average values of 62 +/- 5 GPa for Young's modulus and 0.25 +/- 0.01 for Poisson's ratio, which are considerably lower than previously published values [2-5], and are in good agreement with results from biaxial tests on Borre Probe overcore samples [6-10]. The stress calculations were obtained from re-analyzed elastic parameters and strains, and show primarily a reduction in stress magnitudes. Overall, the stress field obtained with different stress measurement methods and its variation with depth is now quite well resolved. The overcoring data suggest that the principal stresses are inclined with a vertical component dipping about 65 degrees from the horizontal over the investigated rock volume (140-420 m depth). This is interpreted as a result of influence from the sub-vertical NE-2 Fracture Zone that divides the stress data into two stress domains [11], although it may also be an artefact because the sigma(2)- and sigma(3)-magnitudes are of the same order of magnitude. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 138
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Amadei B, 1997, ROCK STRESS ITS MEAS, DOI [10.1007/978-94-011-5346-1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-5346-1_3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-5346-1]
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS ROYAL I TECHN
[3]  
[Anonymous], COMPREHENSIVE ROCK E
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003 RELEASE WORLD S
[5]   Evaluation of measurement-related uncertainties in the analysis of overcoring rock stress data from Aspo HRL, Sweden: a case study [J].
Ask, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2003, 40 (7-8) :1173-1187
[6]  
Ask D, 2001, ROCK MECHANICS IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1401
[7]  
ASK D, 2004, IPR0405 SKB
[8]  
ASK D, 2003, P 10 C INT SOC ROCK, P638
[9]  
ASK D, 2001, THESIS ROYAL I TECHN
[10]  
ASK D, IN PRESS INT J ROCK