A Comparative Study of the Formulations and Benchmark Problems for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms

被引:85
作者
Deepak, Sangamesh R. [1 ]
Dinesh, M. [1 ]
Sahu, Deepak K. [1 ]
Ananthasuresh, G. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
来源
JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2009年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
DESIGN; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1115/1.2959094
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The topology optimization problem for the synthesis of compliant mechanisms has been formulated in many different ways in the past 15 years, but there is not yet a definitive formulation that is universally accepted. Furthermore, there are two unresolved issues in this problem. In this paper, we present a comparative study of five distinctly different formulations that are reported in the literature. Three benchmark examples are solved with these formulations using the same input and output specifications and the same numerical optimization algorithm. A total of 35 different synthesis examples are implemented. The examples are limited to desired instantaneous output direction for prescribed input force direction. Hence, this study is limited to linear elastic modeling with small deformations. Two design parametrizations, namely, the frame element-based ground structure and the density approach using continuum elements, are used. The obtained designs are evaluated with all other objective functions and are compared with each other. The checkerboard patterns, point flexures, and the ability to converge from an unbiased uniform initial guess are analyzed. Some observations and recommendations are noted based on the extensive implementation done in this study. Complete details of the benchmark problems and the results are included. The computer codes related to this study are made available on the internet for ready access. [DOI: 10.1115/1.2959094]
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ananthasuresh G. K, 1994, THESIS U MICHIGAN
[2]  
ANANTHASURESH GK, 1994, 1994 ASME WINT ANN M, V55, P677
[3]  
Bendsoe MP., 2003, Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6
[4]   Toward the topology design of mechanisms that exhibit snap-through behavior [J].
Bruns, TE ;
Sigmund, O .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 193 (36-38) :3973-4000
[5]   Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms [J].
Bruns, TE ;
Tortorelli, DA .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (26-27) :3443-3459
[6]   Topology optimization of compliant mechanical amplifiers for piezoelectric actuators [J].
Canfield, S ;
Frecker, M .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2000, 20 (04) :269-279
[7]  
Chen S., 2007, P ASME 2007 INT DES
[8]   Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multi-criteria optimization [J].
Frecker, MI ;
Ananthasuresh, GK ;
Nishiwaki, S ;
Kikuchi, N ;
Kota, S .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1997, 119 (02) :238-245
[9]   An energy formulation for parametric size and shape optimization of compliant mechanisms [J].
Hetrick, JA ;
Kota, S .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1999, 121 (02) :229-234
[10]   Optimal synthesis of compliant mechanisms using subdivision and commercial FEA [J].
Hull, PV ;
Canfield, S .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2006, 128 (02) :337-348