Techno-economic performance of wind and coal-fired power with CCS joint planning

被引:9
|
作者
Huang Xianzheng [1 ]
Sun Yong [1 ,2 ]
Xu Zhaofeng [1 ]
Xue Yali [1 ]
Wang Zhe [1 ]
Cai Hongyi [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Thermal Engn, State Key Lab Power Syst, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] State Grid Jilinsheng Elect Power Supply Co, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
来源
13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13 | 2017年 / 114卷
关键词
Wind power; coal-fired power; NPV; CCS (carbon capture and storage); CO2; emission;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-fossil energy, especially wind power, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) are considered as the critical methods to mitigate CO2 emissions. In the future the coal-fired power plant with CCS can be used to change its output dynamically with the output of wind power to meet the grid dispatch. Therefore, we build up a joint planning model of wind power and coal-fired power with CCS, and analyse its techno-economic performance including the net present value (NPV), the cost of electricity (COE), the CO2 avoided cost as well as CO2 emission in different cases, in which the capacity proportion of wind power and coal-fired power with CCS is varied. The results show that the finance indexes and emission indexes of the joint planning are in contrary trends, especially the wind power proportion less than 0.5. The best economic performance can be achieved for the pure coal-fired power with CCS, but the best performance of CO2 emission mitigation can happen at the wind power proportion of 0.48. When the wind power proportion is very high, more output of coal-fired power is used to meet the grid demand. Therefore, less power can be used to capture CO2, resulting in a higher CO2 emission of the joint planning. Meanwhile, the COE and CO2 avoided cost are very high. Therefore, the very high wind power proportion is not a good idea for the joint planning. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:6677 / 6684
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techno-economic evaluation of revamping of coal-fired power plants in India
    Dutta, Animesh
    Dutta, Shantanu
    Basu, Prabir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ENERGY ISSUES, 2006, 26 (1-2) : 6 - 42
  • [2] Techno-economic analysis of using carbon capture and storage (CCS) in decarbonizing China's coal-fired power plants
    Liu, Shuyang
    Li, Hangyu
    Zhang, Kai
    Lau, Hon Chung
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 351
  • [3] Techno-economic evaluation of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plants
    Xiong Jie
    Zhao HaiBo
    Zheng ChuGuang
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2011, 56 (31): : 3333 - 3345
  • [4] Techno-economic evaluation of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plants
    XIONG Jie
    Science Bulletin, 2011, (31) : 3333 - 3345
  • [5] Techno-Economic Analysis of Solar Tower Aided Coal-Fired Power Generation System
    Zhu, Yong
    Zhai, Rongrong
    Yang, Yongping
    Angel Reyes-Belmonte, Miguel
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (09):
  • [6] Techno-economic evaluation of chemical looping-based coal-fired power plant
    Zou, Xixian
    Zhao, Haibo
    Zheng, Chuguang
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2014, 34 (35): : 6286 - 6295
  • [7] Techno-economic performance of the coal-to-olefins process with CCS
    Xiang, Dong
    Yang, Siyu
    Liu, Xia
    Mai, Zihao
    Qian, Yu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 240 : 45 - 54
  • [8] Techno-economic analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle integrated with coal-fired power plant
    Thanganadar, Dhinesh
    Asfand, Faisal
    Patchigolla, Kumar
    Turner, Peter
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 242
  • [9] TECHNO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE FACILITIES COUPLED TO COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS
    Zhang, Zhihua
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 26 (6-7) : 1069 - 1080
  • [10] Techno-economic assessment of carbon mitigation options for existing coal-fired power plants in India
    Singh, Udayan
    Rao, Anand B.
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY RESEARCH (ICAER) 2015, 2016, 90 : 326 - 335