The temporal dynamics of emotion regulation: An EEG study of distraction and reappraisal

被引:335
作者
Thiruchselvam, Ravi [1 ]
Blechert, Jens
Sheppes, Gal
Rydstrom, Anders [2 ]
Gross, James J.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Emotion regulation; Reappraisal; Distraction; Event-related potentials; Late positive potential; BRAIN POTENTIALS; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SUPPRESSION; RESPONSES; PERCEPTION; PICTURES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.009
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Distraction and reappraisal are two widely used forms of emotion regulation. The process model of emotion regulation (Gross, 1998) holds that they differ (1) in when they act on the emotion-generative process, and (2) in their impact on subsequent responses to regulated stimuli. We tested these two predictions by measuring electrocortical responses to neutral and emotional images during two phases. In the regulation phase, images were watched or regulated using distraction or reappraisal. During the re-exposure phase, the same images were passively watched. As predicted, during regulation, distraction reduced the late positive potential (LPP) earlier than reappraisal. Upon re-exposure, images with a distraction (but not reappraisal) history elicited a larger LPP than images with an attend history. This pattern of results suggests that distraction and reappraisal intervene at separate stages during emotion generation, a feature which may have distinct consequences that extend beyond the regulatory episode. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 92
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PERSONALITY IN PRESS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Technical Report A-6
  • [3] [Anonymous], OSCILLATORY BRAIN AC
  • [4] Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI
    Bantick, SJ
    Wise, RG
    Ploghaus, A
    Clare, S
    Smith, SM
    Tracey, I
    [J]. BRAIN, 2002, 125 : 310 - 319
  • [5] Brain potentials in perception: Picture complexity and emotional arousal
    Bradley, Margaret M.
    Hamby, Steven
    Low, Andreas
    Lang, Peter J.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 (03) : 364 - 373
  • [6] Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report
    Cuthbert, BN
    Schupp, HT
    Bradley, MM
    Birbaumer, N
    Lang, PJ
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 52 (02) : 95 - 111
  • [7] When does size not matter? Effects of stimulus size on affective modulation
    De Cesarei, Andrea
    Codispoti, Mauriz
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 43 (02) : 207 - 215
  • [8] See no evil: Directing visual attention within unpleasant images modulates the electrocortical response
    Dunning, Jonathan P.
    Hajcak, Greg
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [9] Deconstructing reappraisal: Descriptions preceding arousing pictures modulate the subsequent neural response
    Foti, Dan
    Hajcak, Greg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (06) : 977 - 988
  • [10] Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?
    Fox, E
    Russo, R
    Bowles, R
    Dutton, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2001, 130 (04) : 681 - 700