A study of intellectual property protection policies and innovation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry and beyond

被引:24
作者
Bouet, Dominique [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Grp ESC Pau, F-64075 Pau, France
[2] Univ Maryland, Univ Coll, Adelphi, MD USA
关键词
Innovation; Intellectual property; TRIPs compliance; Developing countries; India; Pharmaceutical; BIOTECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; PATENT; RIGHTS; MARKETS; GRAVITY; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2014.10.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We study the relationship between Trade Related Intellectual Property rights (TRIPS) and innovation. Using export data, this paper aims at assessing the relative impact of TRIPs on innovation, namely the ability of the Indian pharmaceutical industry to enter new markets with existing or new drugs. It examines whether India's decision to comply with TRIPS influenced its innovation, and develops a theoretical model, where innovation, being measured by the likelihood of exports of one product from one identified country to partner countries, is influenced by factor, demand and trade conditions. The paper draws on quantitative data, using Probit and Logit techniques. The model is illustrated using empirical evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry. We find statistically significant evidence that India's compliance with TRIPS is associated with new trade flows from India to partners. However we do not find statistically significant evidence of a relation between TRIPS compliance and value of exports. The interpretation is that TRIPS compliance has different effects: it is a necessary condition to favor innovation but it is not sufficient to increase exports value (competitiveness). Finally, we study to what extent this model can be generalized to other developing countries and/or industries. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Managing knowledge assets under conditions of radical change: The case of the pharmaceutical industry [J].
Allarakhia, Minna ;
Steven, Walsh .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (2-3) :105-117
[2]  
Amichia A. R. H., 2010, ACCORDS DROITS PROPR
[3]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[4]  
ANDERSON JE, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P106
[5]  
[Anonymous], INTRO ECONOMETRICS
[6]  
Aoki R., 2005, IMPLICATIONS PRODUCT
[7]   National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system [J].
Bartholomew, S .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1997, 28 (02) :241-266
[8]  
Batra Amita, 2006, Global Economic Review, V35, P327
[9]  
Bessen J., 2008, PATENTS PROPERTY
[10]   The influence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries [J].
Blind, Knut .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (02) :391-400