Toward an Economic Theory of Religious Belief and the Emergence of Law

被引:4
作者
Cosgel, Metin M. [1 ]
Miceli, Thomas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Econ, 365 Fairfield Way, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT | 2019年 / 175卷 / 04期
关键词
religion; crime; law enforcement; PUNISHMENT; CRIME; GODS;
D O I
10.1628/jite-2019-0035
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the interaction between religion and law as alternative mechanisms for controlling behavior. The model involves a prisoners' dilemma game played by randomly paired members of society. Religious believers cooperate reflexively, but are subject to exploitation by nonbelievers. Law enforcement emerges when the gain to believers from deterrence of nonbelievers exceeds enforcement costs. The results show that some minimal amount of religious belief is a prerequisite for law to emerge, but a high level of belief precludes its emergence. Thus, religion is both a complement and substitute for law. We present empirical evidence to support the argument.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 713
页数:22
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
Gould S. J., 2002, STRUCTURE EVOLUTIONA, DOI [DOI 10.4159/9780674417922, 10.4159/9780674417922]
[12]  
GREIF A, 1993, AM ECON REV, V83, P525
[13]   Believe, But Verify? The Effect of Market Structure on Corruption in Religious Organizations [J].
Gutmann, Jerg .
KYKLOS, 2015, 68 (02) :153-164
[14]  
Hart H.L. A., 1997, The Concept of Law, V2nd
[15]  
Hayek F. A., 1960, CONSTITUTION LIBERTY
[16]  
Holmes Oliver Wendell, 1897, HARV L REV, V10, P457
[17]   Deregulating religion: The economics of church and state [J].
Iannaccone, LR ;
Finke, R ;
Stark, R .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1997, 35 (02) :350-364
[18]   God's punishment and public goods - A test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures [J].
Johnson, DDP .
HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2005, 16 (04) :410-446
[19]  
Johnson Dominic., 2016, GOD IS WATCHING YOU
[20]  
Minkler LanseP., 2004, Review of Social Economy, V62, P27