International Master's Program in health technology assessment and management: Assessment of the first edition (2001-2003)

被引:5
作者
Lehoux, P
Battista, RN
Granados, A
Gallo, P
Tailliez, S
Coyle, D
Marchetti, M
Borgia, P
Ricciardi, G
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Hlth Adm, Ctr Ville Branch, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Quebec Hlth Serv & Technol Assessment Agcy, Montreal, PQ H3A 2S9, Canada
[3] Univ Barcelona, Fac Med, Dept Med, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[4] Catalan Agcy Hlth Technol Assessment & Res, Barcelona 08023, Spain
[5] Univ Barcelona, Dept Sociol & Organizat Anal, Barcelona 08021, Spain
[6] Univ Montreal, Grp Interdisciplinaire Sante, Montreal, PQ M3C 3J7, Canada
[7] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[8] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Agostino Gemelli Polyclin, Hlth Technol Unit, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[9] Publ Hlth Agcy Lazio Reg ASP, I-00198 Rome, Italy
[10] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Hyg & Publ Hlth, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
health technology assessment; higher training and education; continuous medical education;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462305050130
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite a clear call for greater input from health technology assessment (HTA) in the areas of clinical practice and policy making, there are currently very few formal training programs. The objectives of our Consortium were to (i) develop a master's level program in HTA, (ii) test its content with a group of Canadian and European students, and (iii) evaluate the Program's strengths and weaknesses. Objectives: This study presents the results of our evaluation of the first edition of the Master's Program (2001-2003). Methods: The evaluation relied on (i) a self-administered student questionnaire for each course (n = 142), (ii) interviews with students (n = 10), and (iii) interviews with internship supervisors (n = 5). Results: A vast majority of students were satisfied with the course content and particularly appreciated the exercises and materials presented in an intensive format. However, they needed more systematic feedback from faculty members and recommended increasing the methodology content. The six key characteristics of the program are (i) flexible format adapted to the needs of skilled professionals, (ii) continuous interaction between HTA users and producers, (iii) international academic and professional collaboration, (iv) partnership with HTA agencies, (v) global approach to evidence-based methods and practices, and (vi) multidisciplinary approach. Conclusions: Despite the numerous organizational barriers inherent to creating an international program and several areas for improvement in the Program itself, the Ulysses Project was successful in attaining its objectives. Because there is a growing need for human resources with special training in HTA, further efforts need to be devoted to strengthening the international research capacity in HTA.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 112
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], HIGHER ED OPEN DISTA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, GLOBALISING ED TREND
  • [3] A history of ISTAHC - A personal perspective on its first 10 years
    Banta, HD
    Perry, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1997, 13 (03) : 430 - 453
  • [4] HTA education and training in Europe
    Douw, K
    Vondeling, H
    Bakketeig, LS
    Gabbay, J
    Hansen, NW
    Kristensen, FB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 18 (04) : 808 - 819
  • [5] Health technology assessment in Italy
    France, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (02) : 459 - 474
  • [6] Gibbons M., 1994, NEW PRODUCTION KNOWL
  • [7] Health technology assessment in Spain
    Granados, A
    Sampietro-Colom, L
    Asua, J
    Conde, J
    Vazquez-Albertino, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (02) : 532 - 559
  • [8] Executive summary of the ECHTA/ECAHI project
    Jonsson, E
    Banta, HD
    Henshall, C
    Sampietro-Colom, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 18 (02) : 213 - 217
  • [9] Education and support networks for assessment of health interventions -: Working group 5 report
    Kristensen, FB
    Gabbay, J
    Antes, G
    Briones, E
    Britton, M
    Burnand, B
    Engel, G
    Gallo, P
    Pinto, CG
    Siebzehner, MI
    Jönsson, B
    Landa, K
    Liaropoulos, L
    Liberati, A
    Mäkelä, M
    Jensen, BN
    Piestiniene, A
    Raspe, H
    Synnott, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 18 (02) : 423 - 446
  • [10] Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking
    Lavis, JN
    Ross, SE
    Hurley, JE
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2002, 80 (01) : 125 - +