Process intensification by frontal chromatography: Performance comparison of resin and membrane adsorber for monovalent antibody aggregate removal

被引:20
作者
Vogg, Sebastian [1 ]
Pfeifer, Felix [1 ]
Ulmer, Nicole [1 ]
Morbidelli, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Chem & Bioengn, Dept Chem & Appl Biosci, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
aggregate; antibody; frontal chromatography; membrane adsorber; resin; FLOW-THROUGH PURIFICATION; BOVINE SERUM-ALBUMIN; EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES; ADSORPTION; EQUILIBRIA; MECHANISM; IGG1; PH;
D O I
10.1002/bit.27235
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aggregates are amongst the most important product-related impurities to be removed during the downstream processing of antibodies due to their potential immunogenicity. Traditional operations use cation-exchange resins in bind-elute mode for their separation. However, frontal analysis is emerging as an alternative. In this study, a three-step process development for a membrane adsorber and a resin material is carried out, allowing the comparison between the stationary phases. Based on a screening study, optimal loading conditions are determined, which show that weak binding is favored on the membrane and strong binding on the resin. Transfer of these findings to breakthrough experiments shows that at 99% pool purity the yield is higher for the membrane, while the resin can be loaded twice as high, exceeding yields of 85%. For the investigated antibody and based on a given regeneration protocol, the productivity of the two phases is similar, ranging around 200 g/(L center dot h). Due to the higher loading, the resin requires about one-third less buffer than the membrane. Furthermore, the implementation of a wash step after loading allows to further increase yield by about 5%. In comparison to a generic bind-elute process, productivity and buffer consumption are improved by an order of magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 672
页数:11
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] A direct comparison between membrane adsorber and packed column chromatography performance
    Boi, Cristiana
    Malavasi, Andrea
    Carbonell, Ruben G.
    Gilleskie, Gary
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2020, 1612 (1612)
  • [2] Comparison of boron removal by ion-exchange resin in column and hybrid membrane process
    Alharati, Assma
    Swesi, Yousef
    Fiaty, Koffi
    Charcosset, Catherine
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 129 : 34 - 42
  • [3] Performance Comparison of a Laterally-Fed Membrane Chromatography (LFMC) Device with a Commercial Resin Packed Column
    Madadkar, Pedram
    Sadavarte, Rahul
    Ghosh, Raja
    MEMBRANES, 2019, 9 (11)