Severity of omicron variant of concern and effectiveness of vaccine boosters against symptomatic disease in Scotland (EAVE II): a national cohort study with nested test-negative design

被引:138
作者
Sheikh, Aziz [1 ]
Kerr, Steven [1 ]
Woolhouse, Mark [1 ]
McMenamin, Jim [2 ]
Robertson, Chris [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Publ Hlth Scotland, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Math & Stat, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
COVID-19 HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00141-4
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background Since its emergence in November, 2021, in southern Africa, the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant of concern (VOC) has rapidly spread across the world. We aimed to investigate the severity of omicron and the extent to which booster vaccines are effective in preventing symptomatic infection. Methods In this study, using the Scotland-wide Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II) platform, we did a cohort analysis with a nested test-negative design incident case-control study covering the period Nov 1-Dec 19, 2021, to provide initial estimates of omicron severity and the effectiveness of vaccine boosters against symptomatic disease relative to 25 weeks or more after the second vaccine dose. Primary care data derived from 940 general practices across Scotland were linked to laboratory data and hospital admission data. We compared outcomes between infection with the delta VOC (defined as S-gene positive) and the omicron VOC (defined as S-gene negative). We assessed effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, with infection confirmed through a positive RT-PCR. Findings By Dec 19, 2021, there were 23 840 S-gene-negative cases in Scotland, which were predominantly among those aged 20-39 years (11732 [49.2%]). The proportion of S-gene-negative cases that were possible reinfections was more than ten times that of S-gene-positive cases (7.6% vs 0.7%; p<0.0001). There were 15 hospital admissions in S-gene-negative individuals, giving an adjusted observed-to-expected admissions ratio of 0.32 (95% CI 0.19-0.52). The booster vaccine dose was associated with a 57% (54-60) reduction in the risk of symptomatic S-gene-negative infection relative to individuals who tested positive 25 weeks or more after the second vaccine dose. Interpretation These early national data suggest that omicron is associated with a two-thirds reduction in the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation compared with delta. Although offering the greatest protection against delta, the booster dose of vaccination offers substantial additional protection against the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 for omicron compared with 25 weeks or more after the second vaccine dose. Copyright (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 966
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ZOE COVID STUDY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Update on Omicron
[3]   Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine [J].
Baden, Lindsey R. ;
El Sahly, Hana M. ;
Essink, Brandon ;
Kotloff, Karen ;
Frey, Sharon ;
Novak, Rick ;
Diemert, David ;
Spector, Stephen A. ;
Rouphael, Nadine ;
Creech, C. Buddy ;
McGettigan, John ;
Khetan, Shishir ;
Segall, Nathan ;
Solis, Joel ;
Brosz, Adam ;
Fierro, Carlos ;
Schwartz, Howard ;
Neuzil, Kathleen ;
Corey, Larry ;
Gilbert, Peter ;
Janes, Holly ;
Follmann, Dean ;
Marovich, Mary ;
Mascola, John ;
Polakowski, Laura ;
Ledgerwood, Julie ;
Graham, Barney S. ;
Bennett, Hamilton ;
Pajon, Rolando ;
Knightly, Conor ;
Leav, Brett ;
Deng, Weiping ;
Zhou, Honghong ;
Han, Shu ;
Ivarsson, Melanie ;
Miller, Jacqueline ;
Zaks, Tal .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (05) :403-416
[4]  
Breslow N E, 1987, IARC Sci Publ, P1
[5]   HOW BAD IS OMICRON? WHAT SCIENTISTS KNOW SO FAR [J].
Callaway, Ewen ;
Ledford, Heidi .
NATURE, 2021, 600 (7888) :197-199
[6]   Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization [J].
Cele, Sandile ;
Jackson, Laurelle ;
Khoury, David S. ;
Khan, Khadija ;
Moyo-Gwete, Thandeka ;
Tegally, Houriiyah ;
San, James Emmanuel ;
Cromer, Deborah ;
Scheepers, Cathrine ;
Amoako, Daniel G. ;
Karim, Farina ;
Bernstein, Mallory ;
Lustig, Gila ;
Archary, Derseree ;
Smith, Muneerah ;
Ganga, Yashica ;
Jule, Zesuliwe ;
Reedoy, Kajal ;
Hwa, Shi-Hsia ;
Giandhari, Jennifer ;
Blackburn, Jonathan M. ;
Gosnell, Bernadett, I ;
Karim, Salim S. Abdool ;
Hanekom, Willem ;
von Gottberg, Anne ;
Bhiman, Jinal N. ;
Lessells, Richard J. ;
Moosa, Mahomed-Yunus S. ;
Davenport, Miles P. ;
de Oliveira, Tulio ;
Moore, Penny L. ;
Sigal, Alex .
NATURE, 2022, 602 (7898) :654-+
[7]   Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study [J].
Clift, Ash K. ;
Coupland, Carol A. C. ;
Keogh, Ruth H. ;
Diaz-Ordaz, Karla ;
Williamson, Elizabeth ;
Harrison, Ewen M. ;
Hayward, Andrew ;
Hemingway, Harry ;
Horby, Peter ;
Mehta, Nisha ;
Benger, Jonathan ;
Khunti, Kamlesh ;
Spiegelhalter, David ;
Sheikh, Aziz ;
Valabhji, Jonathan ;
Lyons, Ronan A. ;
Robson, John ;
Semple, Malcolm G. ;
Kee, Frank ;
Johnson, Peter ;
Jebb, Susan ;
Williams, Tony ;
Hippisley-Cox, Julia .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 371
[8]  
Ferguson Neil, 2021, Report 50: hospitalisation risk for omicron cases in England
[9]  
GOV.UK, 2020, COVID19 TEST DAT MET
[10]  
Hanson, 2021, CLASSIFICATION OMICR, P2021