Multifidelity Quasi-Newton Method for Design Optimization

被引:17
作者
Bryson, Dean E. [1 ]
Rumpfkeil, Markus P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Res Lab, Aerosp Syst Directorate, Design & Anal Branch, Aerosp Vehicles Div, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[2] Univ Dayton, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
FIDELITY OPTIMIZATION; APPROXIMATION; MODELS; FRAMEWORK; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.2514/1.J056840
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Multifidelity approaches are frequently used in design when high-fidelity models are too expensive to use directly and lower-fidelity models of reasonable accuracy exist. In optimization, corrected low-fidelity data are typically used in a sequence of independent, approximate optimizations bounded by trust regions. A new, unified, multifidelity quasi-Newton approach is presented that preserves an approximate inverse Hessian between iterations, determines search directions from high-fidelity data, and uses low-fidelity models for line searches. The proposed algorithm produces better search directions, maintains larger step sizes, and requires significantly fewer low-fidelity function evaluations than Trust Region Model Management. The multifidelity quasi-Newton method also provides an expected optimal point that is forward looking and is useful in building superior low-fidelity corrections. The new approach is compared with Trust Region Model Management and the BFGS quasi-Newton method on several analytic test problems using polynomial and kriging corrections. For comparison, a technique is demonstrated to initialize high-fidelity optimization when transition away from approximate models is deemed fruitful. In summary, the unified multifidelity quasi-Newton approach required fewer or equal high-fidelity function evaluations than Trust Region Model Management in about two-thirds of the test cases, and similarly reduced cost in more than half of cases compared with BFGS.
引用
收藏
页码:4074 / 4086
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Alexandrov N., 38 AEROSPACE SCI M E, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2000-841
[2]   Approximation and model management in aerodynamic optimization with variable-fidelity models [J].
Alexandrov, NA ;
Lewis, RM ;
Gumbert, CR ;
Green, LL ;
Newman, PA .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2001, 38 (06) :1093-1101
[3]   A trust-region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization [J].
Alexandrov, NM ;
Dennis, JE ;
Lewis, RM ;
Torczon, V .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 15 (01) :16-23
[4]  
[Anonymous], TR161 ACDL
[5]  
[Anonymous], ENG DESIGN VIA SURRO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 46 AIAA ASME ASCE AH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 17 AIAA NOND APPR C
[8]   Space mapping: The state of the art [J].
Bandler, JW ;
Cheng, QSS ;
Dakroury, SA ;
Mohamed, AS ;
Bakr, MH ;
Madsen, K ;
Sondergaard, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2004, 52 (01) :337-361
[9]  
Beran P., 2016, 9 INT C COMP FLUID D
[10]   Unified Framework for Training Point Selection and Error Estimation for Surrogate Models [J].
Boopathy, Komahan ;
Rumpfkeil, Markus P. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2015, 53 (01) :215-234