Quantum advantage with noisy shallow circuits in 3D

被引:3
作者
Bravyi, Sergey [1 ]
Koenig, Robert [2 ]
Gosset, David [3 ,4 ]
Tomamichel, Marco [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] IBM TJ Watson Res Ctr, Quantum Computat & Informat Grp, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Zentrum Math, Inst Adv Study, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Combinator & Optimizat, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Waterloo, Inst Quantum Comp, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Quantum Software & Informat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Comp Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
2019 IEEE 60TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2019) | 2019年
关键词
quantum algorithms; quantum error correction; COMPUTATION;
D O I
10.1109/FOCS.2019.00064
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Prior work has shown that there exists a relation problem which can be solved with certainty by a constant-depth quantum circuit composed of geometrically local gates in two dimensions, but cannot be solved with high probability by any classical constant depth circuit composed of bounded fan-in gates. Here we provide two extensions of this result. Firstly, we show that a separation in computational power persists even when the constant-depth quantum circuit is restricted to geometrically local gates in one dimension. The corresponding quantum algorithm is the simplest we know of which achieves a quantum advantage of this type. Our second, main result, is that a separation persists even if the shallow quantum circuit is corrupted by noise. We construct a relation problem which can be solved with near certainty using a noisy constant-depth quantum circuit composed of geometrically local gates in three dimensions, provided the noise rate is below a certain constant threshold value. On the other hand, the problem cannot be solved with high probability by a noise-free classical circuit of constant depth. A key component of the proof is a quantum error-correcting code which admits constant-depth logical Clifford gates and single-shot logical state preparation. We show that the surface code meets these criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 999
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time
    Aaronson, S
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2005, 461 (2063): : 3473 - 3482
  • [2] Aharonov D, 2018, ARXIV181003912
  • [3] [Anonymous], ARXIV181004233
  • [4] Architectures for Quantum Simulation Showing a Quantum Speedup
    Bermejo-Vega, Juan
    Hangleiter, Dominik
    Schwarz, Martin
    Raussendorf, Robert
    Eisert, Jens
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [5] Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices
    Boixo, Sergio
    Isakov, Sergei, V
    Smelyanskiy, Vadim N.
    Babbush, Ryan
    Ding, Nan
    Jiang, Zhang
    Bremner, Michael J.
    Martinis, John M.
    Neven, Hartmut
    [J]. NATURE PHYSICS, 2018, 14 (06) : 595 - 600
  • [6] Boixo Sergio, 2017, ARXIV171205384
  • [7] Single-Shot Fault-Tolerant Quantum Error Correction
    Bombin, Hector
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2015, 5 (03):
  • [8] Lieb-robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order
    Bravyi, S.
    Hastings, M. B.
    Verstraete, F.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2006, 97 (05)
  • [9] Simulation of quantum circuits by low-rank stabilizer decompositions
    Bravyi, Sergey
    Browne, Dan
    Calpin, Padraic
    Campbell, Earl
    Gosset, David
    Howard, Mark
    [J]. QUANTUM, 2019, 3
  • [10] Quantum advantage with shallow circuits
    Bravyi, Sergey
    Gosset, David
    Koenig, Robert
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2018, 362 (6412) : 308 - +