A novel approach quantifying the periorbital morphology: A comparison of direct, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional technologies

被引:18
作者
Guo, Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, J. [1 ,2 ]
Ruan, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Rokohl, A. C. [1 ,2 ]
Hou, X. [1 ,2 ]
Li, S. [1 ,2 ]
Jia, R. [4 ]
Koch, K. R. [1 ,2 ]
Heindl, L. M. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Eye Ctr, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Ctr Integrated Oncol CIO, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Three-dimensional imaging; Photography; Periocutar soft tissue; Periorbital soft tissue; Eyelid; Brow; UNILATERAL CLEFT-LIP; ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENT; 3D STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; FACIAL MORPHOLOGY; EYEBROW POSITION; RELIABILITY; ACCURACY; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; VALIDATION; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The measurement of anatomical structures is critical in plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, few detailed and standardized measurements have been widely used in the periorbital region. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel detailed and standardized protocol with 2D and 3D technologies, and explore the relationship between them and direct measurements. Methods: Fifty healthy Caucasians (100 eyes) between 20 and 68 years old were recruited and captured for 3D photographs by VECTRA M3 3D Imaging System. Subsequently, 24 landmarks were located on each 3D photographs following a standardized protocol, and then 19 linear and 3 angular periorbital variables were measured. Furthermore, two-dimensional (2D) and direct measurements were conducted on each subject and compared with 3D measurements and one another. Results: The grand r means across all measurements were 0.77, 0.78, and 0.88 for direct vs. 2D values, direct vs. 3D values, and 3D vs. 2D values, respectively. The mean absolute differences were 1 mm (ranging from 0.2 mm to 3.7 mm) between direct and 3D measurements, 1 mm (ranging from 0.04 mm to 2.4 mm) between direct and 2D measurements, and 1 mm and 6.6 degrees (ranging from 0.04 mm or 0.5 degrees to 3 mm or 12.8 degrees) between 2D and 3D measurements. Conclusions: This study verified the feasibility of this detailed and standardized landmark localization protocol for assessing the periorbital morphology with 2D and 3D technologies. This protocol may work as a bridge communicating with all studies involving any of the three technologies in the future. (C) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1888 / 1899
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Repeatability Study of Angular and Linear Measurements on Facial Morphology Analysis by Means of Stereophotogrammetry [J].
Andrade, Lilian Mendes ;
Bettoni Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Maria ;
Magri, Lais Valencise ;
Moreira Rodrigues da Silva, Marco Antonio .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (04) :1107-1111
[2]   EVALUATION OF THE LASER SCANNER AS A SURFACE MEASURING TOOL AND ITS ACCURACY COMPARED WITH DIRECT FACIAL ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
AUNG, SC ;
NGIM, RCK ;
LEE, ST .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1995, 48 (08) :551-558
[3]  
Ayoub A F, 1996, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V11, P225
[4]   Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging [J].
Camison, L. ;
Bykowski, M. ;
Lee, W. W. ;
Carlson, J. C. ;
Roosenboom, J. ;
Goldstein, J. A. ;
Losee, J. E. ;
Weinberg, S. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (03) :403-410
[5]   Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry [J].
Dindaroglu, Furkan ;
Kutlu, Pinar ;
Duran, Gokhan Serhat ;
Gorgulu, Serkan ;
Aslan, Erhan .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2016, 86 (03) :487-494
[6]   Three-dimensional facial anatomy evaluation: Reliability of laser scanner consecutive scans procedure in comparison with stereophotogrammetry [J].
Gibelli, Daniele ;
Pucciarelli, Valentina ;
Poppa, Pasquale ;
Cummaudo, Marco ;
Dolci, Claudia ;
Cattaneo, Cristina ;
Sforza, Chiarella .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (10) :1807-1813
[7]   A Simple Standardized Three-Dimensional Anthropometry for the Periocular Region in a European Population [J].
Guo, Yongwei ;
Schaub, Friederike ;
Mor, Joel M. ;
Jia, Renbing ;
Koch, Konrad R. ;
Heindl, Ludwig M. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (03) :514E-523E
[8]   Reliability of Periocular Anthropometry: A Comparison of Direct, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Techniques [J].
Guo, Yongwei ;
Hou, Xiaoyi ;
Rokohl, Alexander C. ;
Jia, Renbing ;
Heindl, Ludwig M. .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2020, 46 (09) :E23-E31
[9]   Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry [J].
Guo, Yongwei ;
Rokohl, Alexander C. ;
Schaub, Friederike ;
Hou, Xiaoyi ;
Liu, Jinhua ;
Ruan, Yue ;
Jia, Renbing ;
Koch, Konrad R. ;
Heindl, Ludwig M. .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 257 (11) :2517-2531
[10]   Picture Perfect? Reliability of Craniofacial Anthropometry Using Three-Dimensional Digital Stereophotogrammetry [J].
Heike, Carrie L. ;
Cunningham, Michael L. ;
Hing, Anne V. ;
Starr, Erik Stuhaug Jacqueline R. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 124 (04) :1261-1272