Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan and ramipril in elderly patients with mild to moderate systolic and diastolic essential hypertension

被引:13
作者
Mallion, Jean-Michel [1 ]
Omboni, Stefano [2 ]
Barton, John [3 ]
van Mieghem, Walter [4 ]
Narkiewicz, Krzysztof [5 ]
Panzer, Peter-Klaus
Garcia Puig, Juan [6 ]
Stefanadis, Christodoulos [7 ]
Zweiker, Robert [8 ]
机构
[1] CHU Grenoble, F-38043 Grenoble 09, France
[2] Italian Inst Telemed, Varese, Italy
[3] Portiuncula Hosp, Cardiac Res Dept, Galway, Ballinasloe Co, Ireland
[4] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg Campus St Jan, Genk, Belgium
[5] Med Univ Gdansk, Dept Hypertens & Diabetol, Hypertens Unit, Gdansk, Poland
[6] Hosp Univ La Paz, Internal Med & Hypertens Unit, Madrid, Spain
[7] Ippokratio Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Athens, Greece
[8] Leopold Auenbrugger Univ, Sch Med, Graz, Austria
关键词
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; essential hypertension; elderly; olmesartan; ramipril; office blood pressure; BLOOD-PRESSURE REDUCTION; DOUBLE-BLIND; OLDER PATIENTS; GLOBAL BURDEN; TOLERABILITY; MEDOXOMIL; TRIAL; AMLODIPINE; VALSARTAN; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3109/08037051.2010.532332
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (O) and ramipril (R) in elderly patients with essential arterial hypertension. Methods. After a 2-week placebo washout, 351 elderly hypertensive patients aged 65-89 years (office sitting diastolic blood pressure, DBP, 90-109 mmHg and office sitting systolic blood pressure, SBP, 140-179 mmHg) were randomized double-blind to 12-week treatment with O 10 mg or R 2.5 mg once daily. After the first 2 and 6 weeks, doses could be doubled in non-normalized (blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg for non-diabetic and < 130/80 mmHg for diabetic) subjects, up to 40 mg for 0 and 10 mg for R. Office blood pressures were assessed at randomization, after 2, 6 and 12 weeks of treatment; 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was recorded at randomization and after 12 weeks. Results. At week 12, in the intention-to-treat population (170 patients O and 175 R) the rate of normalized subjects was significantly larger in the O group (38.8% vs 26.3% R; p = 0.013). Baseline-adjusted mean sitting office blood pressure reduction at final visit was not significantly greater under O [SBP: 16.6 (95% confidence interval 14.0/19.2) mmHg vs 13.0 (10.4/15.6) mmHg R, p = 0.206; DBP: 11.8 (10.3/13.3) mmHg vs 10.5 (9.0/12.0) mmHg, p = 0.351]. In the subgroup of patients with valid ABP recordings (38 O and 47 R), the reduction in 24-h average blood pressure was significantly (p < 0.01) larger with O [SBP: 8.9 (9.8/8.1) and DBP: 5.7 (6.3/5.1) mmHg] than with R [6.7 (7.9/5.6) and 4.4 (5.1/3.7) mmHg]. The superiority of O was particularly evident in the last 4 h from the dosing interval. The proportion of patients with drug-related adverse events was comparable in the two groups (4.0% O vs 4.5% R), as well as the number of patients discontinuing study drug because of a side-effect (8 0 vs 7 R). Conclusions. In elderly patients with essential arterial hypertension, O provides an effective, prolonged and well tolerated blood pressure control, with significantly better blood pressure normalization than R and represents a useful option among first-line drug treatments of hypertension in this age group.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] AMERY A, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1349
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, JAMA, V265, P3255
  • [3] Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older
    Beckett, Nigel S.
    Peters, Ruth
    Fletcher, Astrid E.
    Staessen, Jan A.
    Liu, Lisheng
    Dumitrascu, Dan
    Stoyanovsky, Vassil
    Antikainen, Riitta L.
    Nikitin, Yuri
    Anderson, Craig
    Belhani, Alli
    Forette, Francoise
    Rajkumar, Chakravarthi
    Thijs, Lutgarde
    Banya, Winston
    Bulpitt, Christopher J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (18) : 1887 - 1898
  • [4] AMBULATORY PRESSURE MONITORING IN THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY
    COATS, AJS
    CONWAY, J
    SOMERS, VK
    ISEA, JE
    SLEIGHT, P
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 1989, 3 : 303 - 311
  • [5] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS IN PRIMARY CARE
    COOPE, J
    WARRENDER, TS
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6555) : 1145 - 1151
  • [6] MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN THE SWEDISH TRIAL IN OLD PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION (STOP-HYPERTENSION)
    DAHLOF, B
    LINDHOLM, LH
    HANSSON, L
    SCHERSTEN, B
    EKBOM, T
    WESTER, PO
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 338 (8778) : 1281 - 1285
  • [7] Olmesartan medoxomil: recent clinical and experimental acquisitions
    Destro, Maurizio
    Preti, Paola
    D'Ospina, Antonio
    Achiri, Ngu Njwe Christian
    Ricci, Alessandra Rossi
    Cagnoni, Francesca
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 5 (09) : 1149 - 1157
  • [8] Antihypertensive activity of angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists:: a systematic review of studies with 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Fabia, Maria Jose
    Abdilla, Noelia
    Oltra, Rosa
    Fernandez, Conrado
    Redon, Josep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 (07) : 1327 - 1336
  • [9] Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly (STONE)
    Gong, LS
    Zhang, WZ
    Zhu, YJ
    Zhu, JR
    Kong, DW
    Page, V
    Ghadirian, P
    LeLorier, J
    Hamet, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1996, 14 (10) : 1237 - 1245
  • [10] Olmesartan Medoxomil in Elderly Patients with Essential or Isolated Systolic Hypertension Efficacy and Safety Data from Clinical Trials
    Heagerty, Anthony M.
    Mallion, Jean-Michel
    [J]. DRUGS & AGING, 2009, 26 (01) : 61 - 76