Managing platform-based ecosystems in B2B markets - out-bound open innovation perspective

被引:6
作者
Tsai, Chung Lin [1 ]
Ahn, Joon Mo [2 ]
Mortara, Letizia [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Dept Business Adm, 168,Sec 1,Univ Rd, Minhsiung Township 62102, Chiayi County, Taiwan
[2] Korea Univ, Dept Publ Adm, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[3] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, 17 Charles Babbage Rd, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England
关键词
platform-based ecosystems; digital platforms; out-bound open innovation; MULTI-SIDED PLATFORMS; DIGITAL INNOVATION; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; EVOLUTION; PRODUCT; FUTURE; INFRASTRUCTURES; ARCHITECTURE;
D O I
10.1504/IJTM.2022.123722
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Technology advancements are underpinning firms in shaping their products and services into digital platforms to foster value co-creation in their platform-based ecosystems. While existing research has mainly focused on business-to-consumer (B2C) platforms, relatively little research has been conducted on business-to-business (B2B) platforms. To address this research gap, this study employs a case study approach to collect and examine three out-bound open innovation (OI) application cases in the context of B2B platforms, namely, TSMC, IBM and CNT Tech. The case analysis results show that the coverage of B2B markets can be expanded and diversified by OI. To improve the quality of platform offerings (not only platform services but also complementary innovations), the case firms implemented OI applications comprising two phases that manage knowledge outflows (with boundary resources) and inflows (with input/output controls) across their organisational boundaries. Knowledge sharing provided B2B platform owners new market creation opportunities, combined complementors, and pivoted some of the platform owners' core technologies, consequently diversifying the platforms' applications and making platform ecosystem more dynamic and vibrant.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 162
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Leveraging open innovation to improve society: past achievements and future trajectories [J].
Ahn, Joon Mo ;
Roijakkers, Nadine ;
Fini, Riccardo ;
Mortara, Letizia .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 (03) :267-278
[2]   Dynamic capabilities and economic crises: has openness enhanced a firm's performance in an economic downturn? [J].
Ahn, Joon Mo ;
Mortara, Letizia ;
Minshall, Tim .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2018, 27 (01) :49-63
[3]   Beyond absorptive capacity in open innovation process: the relationships between openness, capacities and firm performance [J].
Ahn, Joon Mo ;
Ju, Yonghan ;
Moon, Tae Hee ;
Minshall, Tim ;
Probert, David ;
Sohn, So Young ;
Mortara, Letizia .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2016, 28 (09) :1009-1028
[4]   COLLECTIVE INVENTION [J].
ALLEN, RC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1983, 4 (01) :1-24
[5]  
Baldwin C.Y., 2003, Managing in the Modular Age
[6]   Commercial fault tolerance: A tale of two systems [J].
Bartlett, W ;
Spainhower, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2004, 1 (01) :87-96
[7]   The future of the microprocessor business [J].
Bass, MJ ;
Christensen, CM .
IEEE SPECTRUM, 2002, 39 (04) :34-+
[8]   How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors' perspective [J].
Benlian, Alexander ;
Hilkert, Daniel ;
Hess, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 30 (03) :209-228
[9]  
Blaschke M.R., 2018, P 39 INT C INFORM SY
[10]   Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets [J].
Cennamo, Carmelo ;
Santalo, Juan .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (11) :1331-1350