Classifying Software Requirements Using Kano's Model to Optimize Customer Satisfaction

被引:3
作者
Mustasfa, Balsam A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Pahang, Fac Comp Syst & Software Engn, Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia
来源
NEW TRENDS IN SOFTWARE METHODOLOGIES, TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 265卷
关键词
Requirements elicitation; Customer satisfaction; Quality requirements; Kano's model; Questionnaire; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; EXPECTATIONS; QFD;
D O I
10.3233/978-1-61499-434-3-271
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Requirements elicitation is a critical and error-prone stage in software development where user requirements should be defined accurately to ensure the success of the software system. In a highly competitive market, businesses are focusing more on satisfying customer needs which largely affect customers decision to buy the software product, providing the potential for the success of the software in the market. This study aims to investigate whether eliciting and thus fulfilling most of the individual software requirements imply a high level of customer satisfaction, and what type of requirements that define the perceived product quality and as a result customer satisfaction. To achieve this goal, a questionnaire is conducted based on Kano's model for customer satisfaction in an academic environment. The results showed the priorities that should be followed in the implementation of user requirements which may lead to a higher customer satisfaction and as a consequence to the success of the software.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 279
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modelling customer satisfaction from online reviews using ensemble neural network and effect-based Kano model
    Bi, Jian-Wu
    Liu, Yang
    Fan, Zhi-Ping
    Cambria, Erik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (22) : 7068 - 7088
  • [42] Measuring Customer Satisfaction on Software-Based Products and Services: A Requirements Engineering Perspective
    Okike, Ezekiel Uzor
    Mosanako, Seamogano
    FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, VOL 2, 2020, 1027 : 31 - 45
  • [43] PRIORITY OF FACTORS AFFECTED ON CUSTOMER'S SATISFACTION IN THE E-BANKING BY USING KANO MODEL AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (A CASE OF IRANIAN COMMERCIAL BANK)
    Alroaia, Younos Vakil
    Rezaei, Ali Reza
    Abdi, Kambiz
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT (ICM 2011), 2011, : 631 - 643
  • [44] Application of the Kano Model for a Better Understanding of Customer Requirements in Higher Education-A Pilot Study
    Madzik, Peter
    Budaj, Pavol
    Mikulas, Dalibor
    Zimon, Dominik
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [45] Evaluating factors affecting patient satisfaction using the Kano model
    Materla, Tejaswi
    Cudney, Elizabeth A.
    Hopen, Deborah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 32 (01) : 137 - 151
  • [46] Understanding customer needs through quantitative analysis of Kano's model
    Wang, Ting
    Ji, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (02) : 173 - +
  • [47] Classifying restaurant service quality attributes by using Kano model and IPA approach
    Pai, Fan-Yun
    Yeh, Tsu-Ming
    Tang, Cheng-Yeh
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2018, 29 (3-4) : 301 - 328
  • [48] A maturity model and an evaluation system of software customer satisfaction: the case of software companies in Korea
    Leem, CS
    Yoon, YK
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2004, 104 (3-4) : 347 - 354
  • [49] Identifying the impact of incremental innovations on customer satisfaction using a fusion method between importance-performance analysis and Kano model
    Tontini, Gerson
    Picolo, Jaime
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (01) : 32 - +
  • [50] Revealing the expectations and preferences of complaining customers by combining the laddering interviewing technique with the Kano model of customer satisfaction
    Gruber, Thorsten
    Reppel, Alexander
    Szmigin, Isabelle
    Voss, Roediger
    QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH, 2008, 11 (04): : 400 - +