Diagnostic and Prognostic Nomograms for Lung Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

被引:7
作者
Wang, Jianguo [1 ]
Zhao, Hongjun [1 ]
Ye, Lifen [1 ]
Li, Jingyong [1 ]
Zhang, Huaixiao [1 ]
Zhang, Chao [1 ]
Rao, Qishuo [1 ]
Cai, Yurong [1 ]
Xu, Yiping [1 ]
Deng, Youyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiangtan Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
关键词
DISTANT METASTASIS; FEATURES; PATTERNS; RISK;
D O I
10.1155/2022/1750834
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. The lungs are one of the common sites of metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with lung metastases (LM) have a shorter duration of survival. This study is aimed at determining the prognostic factors of patients with TNBC with LM and constructing two nomograms to assess the risk of LM and the prognosis of patients with TNBC with LM. Methods. Clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with TNBC between 2010 and 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to screen for independent predictors of LM in patients with TNBC and identify the independent prognostic factors of patients with TNBC with LM. The two nomograms were appraised using calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results. A total of 27,048 patients with TNBC were included in this study. Age, tumour size, T stage, and N stage were identified as independent risk factors for LM in patients with TNBC. Histological type, marital status, prior surgery, chemotherapy, bone metastases, brain metastases, and LM were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for patients with TNBC with LM. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the diagnostic nomogram was 0.838 (95% confidence interval 0.817-0.860) in the training cohort and 0.894 (95% confidence interval 0.875-0.917) in the verification cohort. The AUC values of the 6-, 12-, and 18-month prognostic nomograms in the training cohort were 0.809 (95% confidence interval 0.771-0.868), 0.779 (95% confidence interval 0.737-0.834), and 0.735 (95% confidence interval 0.699-0.811), respectively, and the corresponding AUC values in the validation cohort were 0.735(95% confidence interval 0.642-0.820), 0.672 (95% confidence interval 0.575-0.758), and 0.705 (95% confidence interval 0.598-0.782), respectively. According to the calibration curves and data analysis, both nomograms exhibited good performance. Conclusion. We successfully constructed and verified two valuable nomograms for predicting the incidence of LM and prognosis of patients TNBC with LM.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Prognostic Factors for Patients with Bone-Only Metastasis in Breast Cancer [J].
Ahn, Sung Gwe ;
Lee, Hak Min ;
Cho, Sang-Hoon ;
Lee, Seung Ah ;
Hwang, Seung Hyun ;
Jeong, Joon ;
Lee, Hy-De .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (05) :1168-1177
[2]   Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye [J].
Balachandran, Vinod P. ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Smith, J. Joshua ;
DeMatteo, Ronald P. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04) :E173-E180
[3]   Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease [J].
Bianchini, Giampaolo ;
Balko, Justin M. ;
Mayer, Ingrid A. ;
Sanders, Melinda E. ;
Gianni, Luca .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 13 (11) :674-690
[4]   Triple-negative breast cancer in the older population [J].
Boyle, P. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 :7-12
[5]   Comparison of patterns and prognosis among distant metastatic breast cancer patients by age groups: a SEER population-based analysis [J].
Chen, Meng-Ting ;
Sun, He-Fen ;
Zhao, Yang ;
Fu, Wen-Yan ;
Yang, Li-Peng ;
Gao, Shui-Ping ;
Li, Liang-Dong ;
Jiang, Hong-Lin ;
Jin, Wei .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[6]  
Dawson S J, 2009, Eur J Cancer, V45 Suppl 1, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70013-9
[7]   Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence [J].
Dent, Rebecca ;
Trudeau, Maureen ;
Pritchard, Kathleen I. ;
Hanna, Wedad M. ;
Kahn, Harriet K. ;
Sawka, Carol A. ;
Lickley, Lavina A. ;
Rawlinson, Ellen ;
Sun, Ping ;
Narod, Steven A. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (15) :4429-4434
[8]   Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Foulkes, William D. ;
Smith, Ian E. ;
Reis-Filho, Jorge S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (20) :1938-1948
[9]   Triple-negative breast cancer-current status and future directions [J].
Gluz, O. ;
Liedtke, C. ;
Gottschalk, N. ;
Pusztai, L. ;
Nitz, U. ;
Harbeck, N. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (12) :1913-1927
[10]   Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis [J].
Gu, Yinfang ;
Wu, Guowu ;
Zou, Xiaofang ;
Huang, Ping ;
Yi, Lilan .
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2020, 26