Gross-Error Detection in GNSS Networks Using Spanning Trees

被引:3
|
作者
Even-Tzur, Gilad [1 ]
Nawatha, Mayas [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israeli Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Div Mapping & Geoinformat Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
ROBUST ESTIMATION; OUTLIER DETECTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000175
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Many methods and techniques have been developed to detect gross errors in geodetic measurements, but none seems to have prevailed. Statistical tests and robust methods are the most common approaches for detecting outliers in geodetic measurements. Least-squares adjustment and iterative attitudes are the essence of those methods. In this paper, closing loops in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) networks are used to detect gross errors. Spanning trees are used to define a set of independent loops in the network. Careful examination of the misclosure of loops assists in defining the faulty vectors. The method is very effective and delivers another alternative for outlier detection without using adjustment computation and statistical tests. The method of outlier detection by means of spanning trees is presented and tested against well-known methods like convectional statistical tests (w-test, -test, and t-test) and robust M-estimation methods (Andrews, Huber, and Danish). A number of tests were performed on a GNSS network that contains 115 points and 917 vectors to detect gross errors in different scenarios, and the results are presented in the paper. Based on the results of the presented tests, it is seen that the w-test and the M-estimation methods correctly detect all outliers in the GNSS network, whereas -tests and t-tests do not always detect the correct errors. The new method for detection of gross errors by means of spanning trees performs quite well and can correctly exclude all outliers with only one iteration.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on detection of gross error in geodetic network adjustment
    Kim, Jung-Hyang
    Kim, Chol-Jin
    Li, Ryong-Jin
    GEODESY AND CARTOGRAPHY, 2018, 67 (01): : 57 - 69
  • [2] A comparative study of anomaly detection methods for gross error detection problems
    Dobos, Daniel
    Nguyen, Tien Thanh
    Dang, Truong
    Wilson, Allan
    Corbett, Helen
    McCall, John
    Stockton, Phil
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 175
  • [3] Least trimmed squares estimator with redundancy constraint for outlier detection in GNSS networks
    Koch, Ismael E.
    Veronez, Mauricio R.
    da Silva, Reginaldo M.
    Klein, Ivandro
    Matsuoka, Marcelo T.
    Gonzaga, Luiz, Jr.
    Camargo Larocca, Ana Paula
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 88 : 230 - 237
  • [4] A novel approach for pilot error detection using Dynamic Bayesian Networks
    Mohamad Saada
    Qinggang Meng
    Tingwen Huang
    Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2014, 8 : 227 - 238
  • [5] A novel approach for pilot error detection using Dynamic Bayesian Networks
    Saada, Mohamad
    Meng, Qinggang
    Huang, Tingwen
    COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS, 2014, 8 (03) : 227 - 238
  • [6] Gross Error Detection and Identification Based on Parameter Estimation for Dynamic Systems
    Jiang Chunyang
    Qiu Tong
    Zhao Jinsong
    Chen Bingzhen
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 17 (03) : 460 - 467
  • [7] Theory and practice of simultaneous data reconciliation and gross error detection for chemical processes
    Özyurt, DB
    Pike, RW
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 28 (03) : 381 - 402
  • [8] Comparison of three gross error detection methods in automatic geometric correction for optical satellite images
    Wang, Mi
    Chang, Xueli
    Zhu, Ying
    Ying, Hexiang
    Cheng, Shiwen
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39 (12): : 1395 - 1400
  • [9] Specific Direction-Based Outlier Detection Approach for GNSS Vector Networks
    Nie, Yufeng
    Yang, Ling
    Shen, Yunzhong
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (08):
  • [10] Automated error detection using association rules
    Malik, Waqas Ahmed
    Unwin, Antony
    INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS, 2011, 15 (05) : 749 - 761