Heat Transfer Limitations in Supercritical Water Gasification

被引:3
作者
Gutierrez Ortiz, Francisco Javier [1 ]
Lopez-Guirao, Francisco [1 ]
Jimenez-Espadafor, Francisco Jose [2 ]
Benjumea, Jose Manuel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn, Camino Descubrimientos S-N, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Dept Energy Engn, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn, Camino Descubrimientos S-N, Seville 41092, Spain
关键词
supercritical water; gasification; reforming; heat transfer; tubular reactor; heating rate; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; TRANSFER DETERIORATION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; CONTINUOUS-FLOW; RESIDENCE TIME; CIRCULAR TUBE; GLYCEROL; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/en15010177
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a promising technology for the valorization of wet biomass with a high-water content, which has attracted increasing interest. Many experimental studies have been carried out using conventional heating equipment at lab scale, where researchers try to obtain insight into the process. However, heat transfer from the energy source to the fluid stream entering the reactor may be ineffective, so slow heating occurs that produces a series of undesirable reactions, especially char formation and tar formation. This paper reviews the limitations due to different factors affecting heat transfer, such as low Reynolds numbers or laminar flow regimes, unknown real fluid temperature as this is usually measured on the tubing surface, the strong change in physical properties of water from subcritical to supercritical that boosts a deterioration in heat transfer, and the insufficient mixing, among others. In addition, some troubleshooting and new perspectives in the design of efficient and effective devices are described and proposed to enhance heat transfer, which is an essential aspect in the experimental studies of SCWG to move it forward to a larger scale.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Recent advances in heterogeneous catalysis for supercritical water oxidation/gasification processes: Insight into catalyst development [J].
Abdpour, Soheil ;
Santos, Rafael M. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 149 :169-184
[2]   Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge by continuous flow tubular reactor: A pilot scale study [J].
Adar, Elanur ;
Ince, Mahir ;
Bilgili, Mehmet Sinan .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 391
[3]   Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge in continuous reactor [J].
Amrullah, Apip ;
Matsumura, Yukihiko .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 249 :276-283
[4]   Biomass Gasification in Supercritical Water - A Review [J].
Basu, Prabir ;
Mettanant, Vichuda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL REACTOR ENGINEERING, 2009, 7
[5]   Comparative study of turbulence model predictions of upward supercritical fluid flow in vertical rod bundle subchannels [J].
Bergmann, Cale M. ;
Ormiston, Scott J. ;
Chatoorgoon, Vijay .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2017, 322 :177-191
[6]   Transformation of glucose into added value compounds in a hydrothermal reaction media [J].
Cantero, Danilo A. ;
Alvarez, Ana ;
Bermejo, M. Dolores ;
Cocero, M. Jose .
JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS, 2015, 98 :204-210
[7]   Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass in a Ceramic Reactor: Long-Time Batch Experiments [J].
Castello, Daniele ;
Rolli, Birgit ;
Kruse, Andrea ;
Fiori, Luca .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (11)
[8]   Low temperature supercritical water gasification of biomass constituents: Glucose/phenol mixtures [J].
Castello, Daniele ;
Kruse, Andrea ;
Fiori, Luca .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2015, 73 :84-94
[9]   An experimental investigation of sewage sludge gasification in near and super-critical water using a batch reactor [J].
Chen, Yunan ;
Guo, Liejin ;
Jin, Hui ;
Yin, Jiarong ;
Lu, Youjun ;
Zhang, Ximin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (29) :12912-12920
[10]   Supercritical water gasification of biomass for hydrogen production Review [J].
Correa, Catalina Rodriguez ;
Kruse, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS, 2018, 133 :573-590