Exergoeconomic analysis and performance assessment of hydrogen and power production using different gasification systems

被引:20
|
作者
Kalinci, Yildiz [2 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [3 ]
机构
[1] Yasar Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Izmir Vocat High Sch, Dept Tech Programs, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Hydrogen production; Downdraft gasification; Circulating fluidized bed gasification; Plasma gasification; Energy; PLASMA GASIFICATION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; ECONOMIC-EFFICIENCY; EXERGY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.040
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate three different gasifiers for hydrogen production, namely, downdraft gasifier (DG), circulating fluidized bed gasifier (CFBG) and plasma gasifier (PG) as taken from the literature under Cases 1-3, respectively. These cases are then modified for cogeneration of hydrogen and power. We use the specific exergy cost (SPECO) method to calculate exergy-related parameters and display cost flows for all streams and components. The case studies are selected from different countries. We study how flow rates of streams cost and hydrogen unit costs change if these facilities operate in Turkey. The process life time is considered 15 years, and the inflation rate and energy inflation rate are taken from the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey as 8.91% and 19.25% while unit energy, water and biomass costs are taken 31.38 $/GJ, 4.59 $/t and 35.42 $/t for Turkey, respectively. The electric power requirements are calculated to be 0.0915, 12.53 and 23.26 MWe for DG, CFBG and PG, respectively. In Cases 1-3, the electric power generated by the systems are 0.144 MW, 1.17 MW and 3.88 MW, respectively and may be sold to the national grid with cost rates of 31.8 $/h, 258.39 $/h and 856.88 $/h. In the systems, the hydrogen production rates and costs per unit mass are obtained to be 0.004 kg/s, 0.521 kg/s and 0.155 kg/s and 1.16 $/kg, 3.33 $/kg and 2.45 $/kg for the DG, the CFBG and the PG, respectively. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 198
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental and thermodynamic performance assessment of biomass gasification process for hydrogen production in a downdraft gasifier
    Marzoughi, Tayebeh
    Samimi, Fereshteh
    Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza
    CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS MODELING, 2022, 17 (06): : 637 - 654
  • [42] Exergoeconomic analysis and performance assessment of selected gas turbine power plants
    Oyedepo, S. O.
    Fagbenle, R. O.
    Adefila, S. S.
    Alam, Md. Mahbub
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2015, 12 (03) : 283 - 300
  • [43] Energetic and exergoeconomic analysis of different configurations of power and hydrogen generation systems using solar based organic Rankine cycle and PEM electrolyzer
    Khani, H. Ghasem
    Nikian, M.
    Ghazi, M.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 231
  • [44] Assessment of thermal performance improvement of GT-MHR by waste heat utilization in power generation and hydrogen production
    Alali, Abdullah E.
    Abulawi, Zaid B.
    Obeidat, Al Yaman M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (44) : 22719 - 22734
  • [45] Techno-economic and life cycle analysis of two different hydrogen production processes from excavated waste under plasma gasification
    Aich, Walid
    Hammoodi, Karrar A.
    Mostafa, Loghman
    Saraswat, Manish
    Shawabkeh, Ali
    Jasim, Dheyaa J.
    Ben Said, Lotfi
    El-Shafay, A. S.
    Mahdavi, Amir
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2024, 184 : 1158 - 1176
  • [46] Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production using biomass gasification -A small scale power plant study
    Sara, Hamedani Rajabi
    Enrico, Bocci
    Mauro, Villarini
    Andrea, Di Carlo
    Vincenzo, Naso
    71ST CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION (ATI 2016), 2016, 101 : 806 - 813
  • [47] Exergoeconomic analysis of a thermochemical copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production using specific exergy cost (SPECO) method
    Orhan, Mehmet F.
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2010, 497 (1-2) : 60 - 66
  • [48] Exergoeconomic Analysis of Corncob Gasification Integrated to a Power Generation System: Case Study in Colombia
    Mendoza Fandino, Jorge Mario
    Rhenals Julio, Jesus David
    Avila Gomez, Adrian Enrique
    Durango Padilla, Elias Ricardo
    REVISTA VIRTUAL DE QUIMICA, 2021, 13 (04) : 919 - 925
  • [49] Thermo-economic and exergy assessment and optimization of performance of a hydrogen production system by using geothermal energy
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein
    Banihashem, Seyed Ali
    Ghazvini, Mahyar
    Sadeghzadeh, Milad
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 29 (08) : 1373 - 1392
  • [50] Assessment of a high-performance geothermal-based multigeneration system for production of power, cooling, and hydrogen: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic evaluation
    Azariyan, Hossein
    Vajdi, Mohammad
    Takleh, H. Rostamnejad
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 236 (236)